2022
DOI: 10.1109/toh.2022.3158386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Kinesthetic and Artificial Tactile Noise and Variability on Stiffness Perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is difficult to conclude whether it is a matter of small effect sizes (albeit our sample size was of a reasonable size) or that the grip force baseline of the negative stretch did not change with repeated interaction. These results are not consistent with previous studies [10], [24], [48], which showed a decrease in the grip force baseline with repeated interactions with an elastic object. These studies attributed this finding to an increase in the certainty regarding the forces, which resulted in a reduction in the safety margin.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is difficult to conclude whether it is a matter of small effect sizes (albeit our sample size was of a reasonable size) or that the grip force baseline of the negative stretch did not change with repeated interaction. These results are not consistent with previous studies [10], [24], [48], which showed a decrease in the grip force baseline with repeated interactions with an elastic object. These studies attributed this finding to an increase in the certainty regarding the forces, which resulted in a reduction in the safety margin.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…It was previously suggested that this variability could stem from differences between participants' skin properties [46], [47] or the way that participants held the device [28]. Interestingly, all prior studies (including our own) [27]- [29], [48] interpreted this variability as different levels of sensitivity to stretch, and assumed that some participants are capable of completely ignoring this stimuli. However, this study, which had a larger sample size and stimulation in different directions, allowed us to propose our model and offer an additional explanation for the variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…F. Quek et al 2013;C. Avraham et al 2020;Farajian et al 2021;Kossowsky et al 2022). This variability might stem from the amount of skin stretch being dependent on various properties of the skin, which is known to change dramatically with age and environmental conditions (Yang et al 2018;Langton et al 2017;Deflorio et al 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fan Liqiang et al [29] presented a multimodal haptic fusion method of cable-drive and ultrasonic haptics that can generate multimodal haptic stimuli. Hanna Kossowsky et al [30] designed haptic feedback consisting of force feedback and artificial skin stretching for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RAMIS). In order to achieve accurate haptic control for robotic surgical tasks, Zhu Xinhe et al [31][32][33] established a force control method based on the Hunt-Crossley model, proposed a nonlinear method for on-line soft tissue characterization, and, based on this, investigated a combination of the Hunt-Crossley contact model with an iterative Kalman filter for a dynamic soft tissue identification method to improve the accuracy of haptic feedback.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%