2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-020-0173-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Irregularity of Lateral Stiffness in Estimating the Separation Gap of Adjacent Frames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e numerical simulations showed that the structural response is significantly affected by the irregularity [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e numerical simulations showed that the structural response is significantly affected by the irregularity [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pounding, which could occur due to an insufficient seismic gap, is an issue that needs to be examined in terms of structural dynamics and earthquake engineering. For this purpose, there are several numerical but limited experimental studies in the literature on subjects such as the pounding force between two adjacent structures, the number of pounding, the moment of collision, and the determination and investigation of the size of the seismic gap [3][4][5][6][7][8]10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine seismic gaps under seismic effects, besides the pounding models used in numerical analysis, studies on the effects of gaps between adjacent buildings, taking into account different parameters, were carried out by Saxena et al [6]. In addition, Khatami et al [7,8], in their studies, investigated the effect of seismic gaps in the presence of lateral stiffness irregularity, soft stories, and regular and irregular adjacent structures using an experimental model of Takabatake et al [9], which had two frames with single span and four-story. In another study, the adjacent buildings were modeled as multidegree systems consisting of lumped masses, and the pounding was simulated using five different earthquake motions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%