2015
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-9046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of intrauterine infusion of dextrose on clinical endometritis cure rate and reproductive performance of dairy cows

Abstract: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the intrauterine administration use of 200 mL of 50% dextrose solution as a treatment against clinical endometritis (CE); CE cure rate and reproductive performance were evaluated. Additionally, the association of several relevant risk factors, such as retained placenta (RP), metritis, CE, anovulation, hyperketonemia, and body condition score with reproductive performance, early embryonic mortality, and CE were evaluated. A total of 1,313 Holstein cows housed on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have evaluated prophylactic and treatment strategies for endometritis using nonantimicrobial intrauterine infusions with antiseptics (Nakao et al, 1988;Knutti et al, 2000;Lew and Kim, 2007), 50% dextrose (Machado et al, 2015), carvacrol (Pinedo et al, 2015), or enzymes (Drillich et al, 2005) as active ingredients; however, the benefits for reproductive efficiency were limited or nonexistent. Despite the lack of strong supporting scientific evidence, our study found that nonantimicrobial intrauterine treatments were widely adopted probably because they do not pose a risk for antimicrobial residues in milk or meat.…”
Section: Nonantimicrobial Intrauterine Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have evaluated prophylactic and treatment strategies for endometritis using nonantimicrobial intrauterine infusions with antiseptics (Nakao et al, 1988;Knutti et al, 2000;Lew and Kim, 2007), 50% dextrose (Machado et al, 2015), carvacrol (Pinedo et al, 2015), or enzymes (Drillich et al, 2005) as active ingredients; however, the benefits for reproductive efficiency were limited or nonexistent. Despite the lack of strong supporting scientific evidence, our study found that nonantimicrobial intrauterine treatments were widely adopted probably because they do not pose a risk for antimicrobial residues in milk or meat.…”
Section: Nonantimicrobial Intrauterine Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, pregnancy per AI for dextrose group (29.2%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (22.5%), a difference that seems logical given the control did not receive any treatment (Maquivar et al, ). Machado et al () concluded that intrauterine infusion of 50% dextrose solution is not a good approach for treating CE and has no influence on first service conception rate, pregnancy maintenance and calving to conception interval (Machado et al, ). They observed the vaginal discharge by a Metricheck device and used a scoring system similar to that employed here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical endometritis and retained placenta (which is the abnormal retention of fetal membranes after calving) also increased the probability of pregnancy losses. Cows with retained placenta had 3.36 times greater odds and cows with clinical metritis had 2.16 times greater odds of losing pregnancy than cows without those diseases (Machado et al, 2015).…”
Section: Uterine Disease and Reproductive Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 92%