2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000131421.66635.af
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Intraoperative Traction During Posterior Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Abstract: The authors do not recommend the routine use of intraoperative traction using a head halter combined with skin traction for all AIS patients undergoing PSIF. However, it could be helpful in selected cases, such as in patients having pelvic obliquity and requiring instrumentation of the pelvis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intraoperative traction All published evidence concerning intraoperative traction in AIS surgery applies to large rigid curves recommend that it not be applied as a routine care procedure [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Optimal (84 %)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraoperative traction All published evidence concerning intraoperative traction in AIS surgery applies to large rigid curves recommend that it not be applied as a routine care procedure [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Optimal (84 %)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mac-Thiong et al 13 showed 40 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who had intraoperative traction using a head halter combined with lower extremity skin traction. They found no difference in correction of the major curve from those patients without traction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Although internal geometry was not directly measured, the emphasis was instead on trunk deformity measures, and the data collected are still useful as correlations have been found between the internal and external geometry. 21,22 Another limitation was the limited sample size. When comparing our data on the R-H frame to 2 similar studies (total of 52 patients), 12,14 there was no significant difference in any of the common trunk geometry indices, showing that our 12 cases are representative of a larger scoliotic population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%