2015
DOI: 10.1115/1.4029157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Internal Crossflow on the Adiabatic Effectiveness of Compound Angle Film Cooling Holes

Abstract: In gas turbine engines, film cooling holes are often fed by an internal crossflow, with flow normal to the direction of the external flow around the airfoil. Many experimental studies have used a quiescent plenum to feed model film cooling holes and thus do not account for the effects of internal crossflow. In this study, an experimental flat plate facility was constructed to study the effects of internal crossflow on a row of cylindrical compound angle film cooling holes. There are relatively few studies avai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to co-flow and counter-flow coolant supply configurations studies, several authors have studied effects of crossflow on film cooling performance compared to plenum or co-flow configurations [7,[11][12][13][14]. In one of these studies, Saumweber et al [12] came to the general conclusion that fan-shaped holes are more sensitive to coolant crossflow than round holes, and the effectiveness of both hole shapes are strongly impacted by the internal coolant flow direction.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to co-flow and counter-flow coolant supply configurations studies, several authors have studied effects of crossflow on film cooling performance compared to plenum or co-flow configurations [7,[11][12][13][14]. In one of these studies, Saumweber et al [12] came to the general conclusion that fan-shaped holes are more sensitive to coolant crossflow than round holes, and the effectiveness of both hole shapes are strongly impacted by the internal coolant flow direction.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (Saumweber et al, 2012a) the authors concluded that this coolant inclination was influenced by blowing ratio and cooling flow Mach number. In (McClintic et al, 2015; geometries with compound injection angles were studied, concluding that higher adiabatic effectiveness was achieved for crossflow counter to the direction of the coolant injection. Finally, it was confirmed that ingestion of mainstream gas was present in cross flow conditions too (McClintinc et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is found that a continuous ribbed cooling channel can increase the laterally averaged heat transfer coefficient compared with smooth cooling channel. MeClintic et al (2015) used an experimental flat plate facility to study the effects of internal cross flow on film cooling performance. Compared with a plenum-fed configuration and the case where the coolant flew in line with the coolant hole span-wise direction, significantly greater adiabatic effectiveness was achieved for cross flow countered to the direction of coolant injection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%