2016
DOI: 10.5507/ag.2016.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of internal and external focus of attention on game performance in tennis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that visual information will be process/treated first. Since this strategy is more useful for beginner due the reduced attention compared with a high level athlete [ 18 , 54 , 55 ], we propose that the colour condition aided in performance strategy similar to that proposed above which impacted towards our observed performance gains. Furthermore, in relation to Fajen and Matthis [ 31 ] action-scaled affordances approach, we speculate that this increase in performance and locomotor action, lead to the direct perception of a greater number of affordances compared to the internal FOA group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This suggests that visual information will be process/treated first. Since this strategy is more useful for beginner due the reduced attention compared with a high level athlete [ 18 , 54 , 55 ], we propose that the colour condition aided in performance strategy similar to that proposed above which impacted towards our observed performance gains. Furthermore, in relation to Fajen and Matthis [ 31 ] action-scaled affordances approach, we speculate that this increase in performance and locomotor action, lead to the direct perception of a greater number of affordances compared to the internal FOA group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Presumed differences in information processing capabilities or ability to maintain a certain attentional focus, relative to young adults, were often used as the rationale for the inclusion of different age groups. Children were asked to perform motor tasks such as riding a Pedalo (Flôres et al, 2015), throwing balls at a target (e.g., Saemi et al, 2013), or playing tennis (Tsetseli et al, 2016). Learning benefits of an EF were found in several studies (e.g., Hadler et al, 2014; Tsetseli et al, 2016), while other researchers (Agar et al, 2016; Emanuel et al, 2008) found no learning differences between groups of children who received EF or IF instructions.…”
Section: Potential Moderatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children were asked to perform motor tasks such as riding a Pedalo (Flôres et al, 2015), throwing balls at a target (e.g., Saemi et al, 2013), or playing tennis (Tsetseli et al, 2016). Learning benefits of an EF were found in several studies (e.g., Hadler et al, 2014; Tsetseli et al, 2016), while other researchers (Agar et al, 2016; Emanuel et al, 2008) found no learning differences between groups of children who received EF or IF instructions. Based on null effects, some of those authors have argued that children may not benefit from an EF, or even that an IF might be more effective.…”
Section: Potential Moderatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the benefit of an external focus has been shown in both closed and open skills. 10,34,63,64 This effect also extends across early and late stages of learning. Therefore, clinicians should evaluate the task goal, establish an optimal challenge level, consider patient preferences regarding the appropriate instructions, and create an external focus in relation to the patient's action capability within the functional task environment.…”
Section: Stages Of Learningmentioning
confidence: 83%