Cpem 2010 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cpem.2010.5544835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of interfering flux on direct current comparator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8(b), which is usually adopted for evaluating the leakage flux influence, the leakage flux for the connection shown in Fig. 8(a) is much closer to the 'normal' operating state [10]. This means the effect of leakage flux is less than 0.022 × 10 −6 of the series ratio of T 3 , and less than 0.005 × 10 −6 of the series ratio of T 2 , and has no noticeable effect on T 1 and T 0 .…”
Section: Leakage Flux Effectmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8(b), which is usually adopted for evaluating the leakage flux influence, the leakage flux for the connection shown in Fig. 8(a) is much closer to the 'normal' operating state [10]. This means the effect of leakage flux is less than 0.022 × 10 −6 of the series ratio of T 3 , and less than 0.005 × 10 −6 of the series ratio of T 2 , and has no noticeable effect on T 1 and T 0 .…”
Section: Leakage Flux Effectmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…T 3 -a 1000-turns as the secondary and ten 1-turn as the primary. To minimize the magnitude of leakage flux from the primary windings [10], for T 0 , T 1 , and T 2 , each section of the primary windings, W pi (i = 1-10), is wound uniformly and loosely, and distributed symmetrically around the cores as shown in Fig. 3(a).…”
Section: A Construction Of Dccsmentioning
confidence: 99%