2011
DOI: 10.1163/092764411x584496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Interfacial Modification on the Properties of Reactively Processed Polypropylene/Clay Nanocomposites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 5, it is apparent that modification with DBMI caused an increase in the strength and the modulus in all nanocomposites studied. This finding is in agreement with the highly effective nature of this reactive interfacial modifier, which also has been found for other composite systems [27][28][29][30]. From Table 4, it is evident that DBMI does not affect the crystallinity of the PP matrix.…”
Section: Effect Of Hnt Modification On the Properties Of The Pp Nanocsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 5, it is apparent that modification with DBMI caused an increase in the strength and the modulus in all nanocomposites studied. This finding is in agreement with the highly effective nature of this reactive interfacial modifier, which also has been found for other composite systems [27][28][29][30]. From Table 4, it is evident that DBMI does not affect the crystallinity of the PP matrix.…”
Section: Effect Of Hnt Modification On the Properties Of The Pp Nanocsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In the case of in situ matrix modification to increase PP polarity, 1% DBMI was added [27]. The mixing temperature was 200°C, and the rotor speed was 200 rpm.…”
Section: Composite Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[20][21][22] It is important to notice that the rise in elongation was not detrimental for the Young's modulus response. These results are very important because in most of the composites filled with clays, the polymer elongation at break was dramatically reduced even at low concentrations of filler.…”
Section: Tensile Testssupporting
confidence: 53%