Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Innovative Research Across Disciplines (ICIRAD 2017) 2017
DOI: 10.2991/icirad-17.2017.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Interaction between The Form of Formative Assessment and Learning Autonomy on Learning by Controlling Mathematical Logical Intelligence

Abstract: Abstract-This study was aimed at investigating the effect of interaction between the form of formative assessment and learning autonomy on learning achievement after controlling mathematical logical intelligence. The forms of formative assessment used in this study consisted of portfolio assessment and essay assessment. This study was conducted at Mathematics Education Department of Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha in Integral Calculus course using 2x2 treatment by level and involving 88 students who were select… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each question was assessed by all students using five types of assessment scores that follow a Likert scale. A score of 5 is mean excellent, a score of 4 is mean good, a score of 3 is mean moderate, a score of 2 is mean less, and a score of 1 is mean poor ( Joshi, Kale, Chandel & Pal, 2015;Louangrath & Sutanapong, 2018;Mahayukti, Dantes, Candiasa, Marhaeni, Gita & Divayana, 2018). The content validity tests of multiple-choice questions were conducted by three experts in the field of educational evaluation and three experts in the field of informatics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each question was assessed by all students using five types of assessment scores that follow a Likert scale. A score of 5 is mean excellent, a score of 4 is mean good, a score of 3 is mean moderate, a score of 2 is mean less, and a score of 1 is mean poor ( Joshi, Kale, Chandel & Pal, 2015;Louangrath & Sutanapong, 2018;Mahayukti, Dantes, Candiasa, Marhaeni, Gita & Divayana, 2018). The content validity tests of multiple-choice questions were conducted by three experts in the field of educational evaluation and three experts in the field of informatics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LAU embodies interns' motivation to define their predetermined learning tasks, effectively manage their learning time, and strategically work towards accomplishing their learning goals (Poltim€ ae et al, 2023;Wijaya, 2021), consequently influencing interns' attainment of learning achievement (e.g. performance) (Mahayukti et al, 2017). Interns who are steeped in a high degree of LAU exhibit adeptness in exerting considerable control over their learning processes, thereby equipping them to adeptly navigate the ever-evolving dynamics of the workplace (Barillaro, 2011).…”
Section: H1mentioning
confidence: 99%