2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ro-man46459.2019.8956427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Interaction and Design Participation on Teenagers’ Attitudes towards Social Robots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These included societal implications (environmental impact, over-reliance on technological solutions to mental health problems), commercial considerations (surveillance and data security, harmful advertising), and personal experiences (judgment from others for using a robot, feeling responsible for the robot's feelings, making the robot angry, feeling rejected by the robot). These themes are consistent with those of other user groups, including older adults [14,15,24,41,[48][49][50]. However, children and families also pointed to the unique advantages of a robots as responsive smart objects, particularly as a non-judgmental source of social support and pet-like comfort objects.…”
Section: Ethicssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…These included societal implications (environmental impact, over-reliance on technological solutions to mental health problems), commercial considerations (surveillance and data security, harmful advertising), and personal experiences (judgment from others for using a robot, feeling responsible for the robot's feelings, making the robot angry, feeling rejected by the robot). These themes are consistent with those of other user groups, including older adults [14,15,24,41,[48][49][50]. However, children and families also pointed to the unique advantages of a robots as responsive smart objects, particularly as a non-judgmental source of social support and pet-like comfort objects.…”
Section: Ethicssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…We explored need-finding through interviews with experts in HRI to collect untapped opportunities for social robots [58,59]. Need-finding is a methodological tool for both grounding and inspiring research and allows us to quickly enter a user's world, casting the user as an expert who can teach us the meaning of a given task, objects, or technology.…”
Section: Methods and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EMAR V4 with flexible software for customized teenager-robot interactions, does not have a fully customizable body but rather a hard shell that does not enable individual personalization [60]. OPSORO is an inexpensive and customizable robot but lacks robustness to be used across different use cases [58], [59].Additionally, many robot kits developed for education are made with arts and crafts materials not allowing a robust robot that can be deployed in real contexts of use. There is an almost unlimited design space for robots to have different colors, heights, materials, shapes, and forms.…”
Section: Customizable Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative attitude towards robot scale (NARS) and robot anxiety scale (RAS) [10] have been used to quantify human workers' cognitive strain, whereas facial expressions have also been monitored, using cameras, as behavioural stress indicators [1]. Another 10-item questionnaire, the perceived stress scale (PSS-10), was employed by Björling et al (2019) to evaluate the perceived stress of a teen during robot interaction [11]. Rossato et al (2021) assessed the subjective experience of senior and younger workers in HRC using the technology acceptance model (TAM) and NASA-TLX for measuring a user's acceptance of technology and cognitive task load, respectively [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%