2019
DOI: 10.1111/evj.13110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of insulin infusion on heart rate and systemic blood pressure in horses with equine metabolic syndrome

Abstract: Summary Background There is little evidence that horses with equine metabolic syndrome (EMS) have higher resting blood pressures than horses with normal insulin sensitivity. However, there are indications that EMS horses have an altered dynamic response to the cardiovascular effects of insulin. Objectives To examine heart rate and the systemic blood pressure response in EMS and control horses during insulin infusion. Study design Cross‐sectional study. Methods Horses were examined with an oral sugar test (OST)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Over time however mean SBP, DBP, and MAP became significantly higher in HE compared to control mares, indicating a diet‐induced difference in BP between the groups. Our findings are similar to those of a previous study that suggested an inability of ID horses to undergo insulin‐induced vasodilatation 11 . Inability to dilate blood vessels in response to insulin is assumed to be the result of a decrease in the vasodilatory (phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase) pathway during ID states, whereas the vasoconstrictor (mitogen‐activated protein kinase) pathway is intact or enhanced, leading to decreased endothelium‐dependent vasodilatation 5,8‐10 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over time however mean SBP, DBP, and MAP became significantly higher in HE compared to control mares, indicating a diet‐induced difference in BP between the groups. Our findings are similar to those of a previous study that suggested an inability of ID horses to undergo insulin‐induced vasodilatation 11 . Inability to dilate blood vessels in response to insulin is assumed to be the result of a decrease in the vasodilatory (phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase) pathway during ID states, whereas the vasoconstrictor (mitogen‐activated protein kinase) pathway is intact or enhanced, leading to decreased endothelium‐dependent vasodilatation 5,8‐10 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Moreover, insulin stimulates the renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system, inducing increased renal sodium reabsorption and blood volume expansion 6,7 . There are indications that the vasodilator pathway is suppressed during insulin resistant (IR) states, whereas the vasoconstrictor pathway is intact or heightened, 5,8‐10 leading to diminished variability in the BP response because of limited vasodilatory capacity, as illustrated by the effect of insulin infusion on BP during an euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp (EHC) in IR horses 11,12 . Systolic, diastolic (DBP), and mean arterial blood pressure of control horses decreased gradually during the EHC, whereas obese EMS‐horses experienced no decrease 11 and normal weight IR horses experienced less decrease than did controls, 12 indicating a decreased vasodilatory response in IR horses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[47] However, evidence from human and experimental studies supports the major role of hyperinsulinemia in exacerbating hypertension, but not in initiating hypertension. [48][49][50] MC bioactive components, such as charantin, polypeptide-p and phenolic compounds, might be capable of stimulating insulin secretion, improving insulin sensitivity and facilitating the recovery of damaged pancreatic islet beta cells. [51,52] Various mechanisms were reported in this regard, which are mainly based on animal studies, including modulation of insulin signaling pathway, phosphorylation of the insulin receptor substrate-1, and stimulation of peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptors gamma (PPARγ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Horses were classified as IR if their M index was < 2.4 mg/kg/min. This cut-off level was based on the normal distribution of the M index (mean and 95 % confidence interval; 3.8 (2.4-5.2) in a group of metabolically healthy control horses (Icelandic horses and Gotland ponies) from a previous study [30]. The lower confidence interval for the M index in this group of horses was used as the cut-off for IR in the present study.…”
Section: Ehceuglycemic Hyperinsulinemic Clampmentioning
confidence: 99%