1993
DOI: 10.1016/s0017-9310(05)80060-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of inlet flow distribution on catalytic conversion efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the results obtained in this study should not be adopted directly for policy decisions in other countries. Moreover, recent studies have indicated the PAH emissions from the gasoline-powered engine might also be affected by the types of lubricant (15) and catalytic converter (16). Because other types of engine, gasoline fuel, lubricant, and catalytic converter will affect PAHs emission in the engine exhaust, further studies should be conducted to extend the generality of the above findings.…”
Section: Yearmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the results obtained in this study should not be adopted directly for policy decisions in other countries. Moreover, recent studies have indicated the PAH emissions from the gasoline-powered engine might also be affected by the types of lubricant (15) and catalytic converter (16). Because other types of engine, gasoline fuel, lubricant, and catalytic converter will affect PAHs emission in the engine exhaust, further studies should be conducted to extend the generality of the above findings.…”
Section: Yearmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We identified PAHs using the selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode. The GC/mass spectrometer (MS) was calibrated with a diluted standard solution of 16 We determined PAH recovery efficiencies by spiking the filter/cartridge with solutions containing known PAH concentrations through the same experimental procedure applied to the field samples. The recovery efficiency of PAHs varied between 0.736 and 1.15 and averaged 0.859.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The turbulent flows in the exhaust pipe and in the diffuser were modeled by the k-e model. In the narrow monolith channels the flow becomes laminar, and the monolith was modeled as a porous body, a method outlined by Karvounis and Assanis [1]. The flow was assumed to be isothermal, incompressible, steady, three-dimensional and axi-symmetrical.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The separation of flow near the wall of the diffuser causes the velocity to be lower in the outer channels of the monolith. The flow real-distribution has been shown to increase with increasing diffuser angle (0) and increasing flow rate [1,2]. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that the flow distribution becomes more uniform when the pressure drop over the monolith is increased, for instance by a reduced channel diameter or by using a longer monolith [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow uniformity was increased by utilizing higher cell density monoliths with smaller hydraulic diameter and by splitting the monolith into two parts separated by a gap [8][9][10][11]. Lower flow uniformity was observed in 3D steady state and transient numerical simulations in systems with higher monolith-to-inlet diameter ratios [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%