2015
DOI: 10.1080/15592324.2015.1062200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of indole-3-carbinol on PIN1 and PIN2 in Arabidopsis roots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kerwin et al, 2015;; D J Kliebenstein, Kroymann, et al, 2001;D J Kliebenstein, Lambrix, Reichelt, Gershenzon, & Mitchell-Olds, 2001; James E. Rodman, Kruckeberg, & Al-Shehbaz, 1981;James Eric Rodman, 1980;Sønderby et al, 2010;Wright, Lauga, & Charlesworth, 2002). GSLs consist of a common core structure with a highly diverse side chain that determines the GSLs biological activity in defense, growth, development and abiotic stress resistance (Beekwilder et al, 2008;Hansen et al, 2008;Hasegawa, Yamada, Kosemura, Yamamura, & Hasegawa, 2000;Katz et al, 2020;Katz, Nisani, Sela, Behar, & Chamovitz, 2015;Malinovsky et al, 2017;Salehin et al, 2019;Yamada et al, 2003). The Arabidopsis-GSL system is an optimal model to study the species wide processes driving specialized metabolite variation because the identity of the whole biosynthetic pathway is known, including the major causal loci for natural variation (Benderoth et al, 2006;Brachi et al, 2015;Chan et al, 2011Chan et al, , 2010D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kerwin et al, 2015;; D J Kliebenstein, Kroymann, et al, 2001;D J Kliebenstein, Lambrix, Reichelt, Gershenzon, & Mitchell-Olds, 2001; James E. Rodman, Kruckeberg, & Al-Shehbaz, 1981;James Eric Rodman, 1980;Sønderby et al, 2010;Wright, Lauga, & Charlesworth, 2002). GSLs consist of a common core structure with a highly diverse side chain that determines the GSLs biological activity in defense, growth, development and abiotic stress resistance (Beekwilder et al, 2008;Hansen et al, 2008;Hasegawa, Yamada, Kosemura, Yamamura, & Hasegawa, 2000;Katz et al, 2020;Katz, Nisani, Sela, Behar, & Chamovitz, 2015;Malinovsky et al, 2017;Salehin et al, 2019;Yamada et al, 2003). The Arabidopsis-GSL system is an optimal model to study the species wide processes driving specialized metabolite variation because the identity of the whole biosynthetic pathway is known, including the major causal loci for natural variation (Benderoth et al, 2006;Brachi et al, 2015;Chan et al, 2011Chan et al, , 2010D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While normally a number of CycB1-expressing cells are visible in the root meristem, following I3C treatment, no CycB1-containing cells were detected, indicating a cessation of cell division. This conclusion is supported by transcript-profiling results showing the downregulation of cell cycle genes six hours following exposure to I3C 55 .…”
Section: Indole-3-carbinol and Plantsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Specific autophagy targets damaged proteins and other cellular components for degradation 59 and is seen in the co-localization of the GFP-AtATG8A and mCherry-AtNBR1 marker proteins in autophagosomes following I3C treatment. The I3C-induced autophagy targets the TIR1 auxin receptor, thus connecting I3C-dependent inhibition of auxin signaling 55 and the I3C induction of autophagy 58 .…”
Section: Indole-3-carbinol and Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highly reactive ITC hydrolysis product gives rise to a multitude of different compounds ( Agerbirk et al, 2009 ). One of these, I3C, was recently reported to exhibit auxin-antagonistic behavior via its competitive binding to TIR1 – the major auxin receptor ( Katz et al, 2015a , b ). This proposes a function of an I3G hydrolysis product as inhibitor of auxin signaling upon attack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%