1939
DOI: 10.2307/1537653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Increasing Time of Development at Constant Temperature on the Wing Size of Vestigial of Drosophila Melanogaster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1940
1940
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences between reciprocal crosses somewhat similar to those encountered in this work have also been described for vg by Hersh andWard (1932), andChild (1939). No data were presented dealing with differences in wing size related to eclosion order, or to amount of substrate per larva, nor have tests of homogeneity been reported.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Differences between reciprocal crosses somewhat similar to those encountered in this work have also been described for vg by Hersh andWard (1932), andChild (1939). No data were presented dealing with differences in wing size related to eclosion order, or to amount of substrate per larva, nor have tests of homogeneity been reported.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…As first noted by T.H. Morgan, morphological phenotypes can be suppressed by limiting the nutrition of mutant animals (Child, 1939;Morgan, 1915;Morgan, 1929;Sang and Burnet, 1963). Likewise, raising animals under lowered temperatures can sometimes suppress the phenotypes of mutations that are not classical ts alleles (Child, 1935;Krafka, 1920;Lewis et al, 1980;Villee, 1943).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…As first noted by T.H. Morgan, morphological phenotypes can be suppressed by limiting the nutrition of mutant animals (Child, 1939;Morgan, 1915;Morgan, 1929;Sang and Burnet, 1963). Likewise, raising animals under lowered temperatures can sometimes suppress the phenotypes of mutations that are not classical ts alleles (Child, 1935;Krafka, 1920;Lewis et al, 1980;Villee, 1943).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%