2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of implant number and position on the stress behavior of mandibular implant retained overdentures: A three-dimensional finite element analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
32
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
32
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Implant-retained overdentures are the primary treatment method applied to edentulous patients today 3 . However, the distribution of stress in dental implants remains a highly controversial issue in the literature 1,6,7,15,16 . Kan et al 6 described that the inter-implant distance is important in the distribution of stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Implant-retained overdentures are the primary treatment method applied to edentulous patients today 3 . However, the distribution of stress in dental implants remains a highly controversial issue in the literature 1,6,7,15,16 . Kan et al 6 described that the inter-implant distance is important in the distribution of stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FEA is the adequate method for evaluating stress analyzes of implants. Few FEA studies comparing the locations of endosseous anterior implants in the edentulous mandible are available 1,6,7,17 and most of the published research evaluates the number of implants to be applied using FEA 1,18 . Topkaya and Solmaz 1 reported that the stresses measured in four-implant-supported models are lower than those measured in two-implant-supported models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…11 Concerning stresses around the implant site, a four implants model demonstrated less stress than two implants in all directions of loading. 12 While clinical and radiographical data revealed no difference between two and four implants. 9…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%