The effect of implant number and position on the stress behavior of mandibular implant retained overdentures: A three-dimensional finite element analysis
“…Implant-retained overdentures are the primary treatment method applied to edentulous patients today 3 . However, the distribution of stress in dental implants remains a highly controversial issue in the literature 1,6,7,15,16 . Kan et al 6 described that the inter-implant distance is important in the distribution of stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FEA is the adequate method for evaluating stress analyzes of implants. Few FEA studies comparing the locations of endosseous anterior implants in the edentulous mandible are available 1,6,7,17 and most of the published research evaluates the number of implants to be applied using FEA 1,18 . Topkaya and Solmaz 1 reported that the stresses measured in four-implant-supported models are lower than those measured in two-implant-supported models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, the force was applied to the implant, abutment, and prosthetic materials at an angle 1,6,7,16,17 . Meijer et al 7 applied vertical, 35 N; horizontal, 10 N; and oblique, 70 N static forces on an angular bar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preservation of esthetics and restoration of lost tissues has long been the main purpose of dentistry 1 . The invention of osseointegrated dental implants has increased the usability of prosthetic applications in edentulous patients 2 .…”
Objectives: To evaluate stress distribution around dental implants in the areas of the canine region (CR) and the second incisor region (SIR) of the mandible in implant-supported prostheses by 3-dimensional finite analysis (FEA). Methods: The cadaveric mandible and the Ti-6Al-4V implant with 4.0 diameter 10 mm length were performed in 3-D scanning and modelled. After transferred to the FEA program (Ansys 13), four variations were analyzed to represent differences in implant location (i.e., SIR or CR) with two vertical loading forces were applied to the midline (60 N) and posterior line (100 N) of a bar placed between implants. The von Mises and Principal stresses were evaluated by FEA.
“…Implant-retained overdentures are the primary treatment method applied to edentulous patients today 3 . However, the distribution of stress in dental implants remains a highly controversial issue in the literature 1,6,7,15,16 . Kan et al 6 described that the inter-implant distance is important in the distribution of stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FEA is the adequate method for evaluating stress analyzes of implants. Few FEA studies comparing the locations of endosseous anterior implants in the edentulous mandible are available 1,6,7,17 and most of the published research evaluates the number of implants to be applied using FEA 1,18 . Topkaya and Solmaz 1 reported that the stresses measured in four-implant-supported models are lower than those measured in two-implant-supported models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, the force was applied to the implant, abutment, and prosthetic materials at an angle 1,6,7,16,17 . Meijer et al 7 applied vertical, 35 N; horizontal, 10 N; and oblique, 70 N static forces on an angular bar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preservation of esthetics and restoration of lost tissues has long been the main purpose of dentistry 1 . The invention of osseointegrated dental implants has increased the usability of prosthetic applications in edentulous patients 2 .…”
Objectives: To evaluate stress distribution around dental implants in the areas of the canine region (CR) and the second incisor region (SIR) of the mandible in implant-supported prostheses by 3-dimensional finite analysis (FEA). Methods: The cadaveric mandible and the Ti-6Al-4V implant with 4.0 diameter 10 mm length were performed in 3-D scanning and modelled. After transferred to the FEA program (Ansys 13), four variations were analyzed to represent differences in implant location (i.e., SIR or CR) with two vertical loading forces were applied to the midline (60 N) and posterior line (100 N) of a bar placed between implants. The von Mises and Principal stresses were evaluated by FEA.
“…11 Concerning stresses around the implant site, a four implants model demonstrated less stress than two implants in all directions of loading. 12 While clinical and radiographical data revealed no difference between two and four implants. 9…”
Aim:To evaluate the satisfaction of completely edentulous patients with a different number of implants to retain removable and support the fixed prosthesis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.