1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf02817888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of hydrostatic pressure on the deformation behavior of maraging and HY-80 steels and its implications for plasticity theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
87
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An asymmetry between tension and compression has been found for material like SMA, this effect is also called SD-effect for "strength differential effect" [2], [3] and [4]. This effect appears clearly on the surface at the initiation transformation from austenite to martensite under proportional loading.…”
Section: Taking Into Account the Asymmetry Between Tension And Comprementioning
confidence: 96%
“…An asymmetry between tension and compression has been found for material like SMA, this effect is also called SD-effect for "strength differential effect" [2], [3] and [4]. This effect appears clearly on the surface at the initiation transformation from austenite to martensite under proportional loading.…”
Section: Taking Into Account the Asymmetry Between Tension And Comprementioning
confidence: 96%
“…As is indicated by experiments, yield surface is often well described by a proper quadric surface which provides a description of the strength-differential effect [24][25][26] in uniaxial states. According to (2.2), each energy component Φ i is proportional to |σ i | 2 .…”
Section: Yield Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of them were developed under the assumption that the hydrostatic stress does not influence neither the elasticity limit nor the plastic flow. Facing the experimental data gathered for decades this assumption cannot always hold true.A definite influence of pressure on the yield stress was proved by experiments (Spitzig, Richmond and Sober [36] [37], Wilson [38] and others). The relation between pressure sensitivity and the strength differential effect was also pointed out [39].…”
Section: Brief Review On the Limit Criteria For Anisotropic Solidsmentioning
confidence: 99%