2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of hydrogeological conditions on variability and dynamic of groundwater recharge in a carbonate aquifer at local scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the winter of 2014/15, the interval between major precipitations events exceeded 20 days, therefore, by Figure 7. Computed annual recharge of total and diffuse infiltration at the EK4, Sataf, and Matash sub-basins over the expected recharge range (grey) at the study area [32]. The recharge range is between fast flow paths along conduits and slow flow paths through the matrix.…”
Section: Implications For Groundwater Enrichment Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the winter of 2014/15, the interval between major precipitations events exceeded 20 days, therefore, by Figure 7. Computed annual recharge of total and diffuse infiltration at the EK4, Sataf, and Matash sub-basins over the expected recharge range (grey) at the study area [32]. The recharge range is between fast flow paths along conduits and slow flow paths through the matrix.…”
Section: Implications For Groundwater Enrichment Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general flow direction is westward. The flow characteristics in the unsaturated zone were described by [32,33], who demonstrated a source-response mechanism between precipitation and groundwater level. The vegetation in study area is defined as Maquis and forests [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of field data describing the dominant hydrological processes and functioning of a basin, it was often recommended to make use of the more readily accessible and measurably physical basin form (Savenije, 2010) and then to differentiate landscape units according to a hydrologically meaningful landscape classification metric to translate form into function (subject of the follow-up paper by Messerschmid et al, 2020). For the link between physical features and basin response, Eder et al (2003) and Hartmann et al (2013) suggested the use of so-called hydrological system signatures to describe emergent properties of a system -both quantitatively or qualitatively -such as flow duration curves or spring hydrographs.…”
Section: Global and Specific Problems In Distributed Recharge Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andreo et al, 2008) may provide more spatial detail, but have not yet been applied in the WAB. However, spatial characteristics of different lithologies, land forms and soil conditions are of outmost importance to actual recharge (Dvory, et al, 2016, Hartmann et al, 2012and Allocca et al, 2014. Such spatially differentiated recharge factors were applied by Andreo et al (2008) and Radulović et al (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%