The effect of HIIT vs. SIT on muscle oxygenation in trained sprint kayakers

Paquette, Myriam; Bieuzen, François; Billaut, François

doi:10.1007/s00421-021-04743-z

Cited by 12 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…From a subgroup analysis (n = 7), no difference in cadence was detected. For the same subgroup, HR response during bout 2 and 4 was significantly elevated relative to bout 1, suggesting a cardiac drift during exercise in the severe intensity domain that agrees with a prior report from Jones et al (2011).Within each severe-intensity bout, muscle oxygenation displayed an expected desaturation response from the onset to the end of each bout, as seen in previous reports (16,(34)(35)(36)(37). Our results showed an increase in onset SmO 2 values between the first two bouts and final two bouts, reflecting postexercise hyperemia, which is a function of metabolic disturbance (38-40).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

The effect of severe intensity bouts on muscle oxygen saturation responses in trained cyclists

Yogev

Arnold

Nelson

et al. 2023

Front. Sports Act. Living

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) quantifies muscle oxygenation (SmO2) during exercise. Muscle oxygenation response to self-paced, severe-intensity cycling remains unclear. Observing SmO2 can provide cycling professionals with the ability to assess muscular response, helping optimize decision-making. We aimed to describe the effect of self-paced severe intensity bouts on SmO2, measured noninvasively by a wearable NIRS sensor on the vastus lateralis (VL) muscle, and examine its reliability. We hypothesized a greater desaturation response with each bout, whereas, between trials, good reliability would be observed. Fourteen recreationally trained, and trained cyclists completed a ramp test to determine the power output (PO) at the respiratory compensation point (RCP). Athletes completed two subsequent visits of 50-minute sessions that included four severe-intensity bouts done at 5% above RCP PO. Muscle oxygenation in the VL was monitored using a wearable NIRS device. Measures included mean PO, heart-rate (HR), cadence, and SmO2 at bout onset, during work (work SmO2), and ΔSmO2. The bouts were compared using a one-way repeated measures ANOVA. For significant differences, a Fisher's least square difference post-hoc analysis was used. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used using trial and bout as main factors. Intraclass correlations (ICC) were used to quantify relative reliability for mean work, and standard error of the measurement (SEM) was used to quantify absolute agreement of mean work SmO2. Both PO and cadence showed no effect of bout or trial. Heart-rate at bout 2 (168 ± 8 bpm) and 4 (170 ± 7 bpm) were higher than bout 1 (160 ± 6 bpm). Onset SmO2 (%) response significantly increased in the final two bouts of the session. Mean work SmO2 increased across bouts, with the highest value displayed in bout 4 (36 ± 22%). ΔSmO2 showed a smaller desaturation response during bout 4 (27 ± 10%) compared to bout 3 (31 ± 10%). Mean work SmO2 ICC showed good reliability (ICC = 0.87), and SEM was 12% (CI 9-15%). We concluded that a non-invasive, affordable, wearable NIRS sensor demonstrated the heterogeneous muscle oxygenation response during severe intensity cycling bouts with good reliability in trained cyclists.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

The effect of severe intensity bouts on muscle oxygen saturation responses in trained cyclists

Yogev

Arnold

Nelson

et al. 2023

Front. Sports Act. Living

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…After, in a second step, studies were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies that presented just one of the protocols and results in graphical mode that did not allow for data extraction by software were excluded [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. Finally, 19 studies were meta-analyzed ( Figure 1 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

HIIT vs. SIT: What Is the Better to Improve V˙O2max? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Oliveira-Nunes

Castro

Sardeli

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lack of time is seen as a barrier to maintaining a physically active lifestyle. In this sense, interval training has been suggested as a time-efficient strategy for improving health, mainly due to its potential to increase cardiorespiratory fitness. Currently, the most discussed interval training protocols in the literature are the high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and the sprint interval training (SIT). Objective: We investigated, through a systematic review and meta-analysis, which interval training protocol, HIIT or SIT, promotes greater gain in cardiorespiratory fitness (V˙O2max/peak). The studies were selected from the PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus and Web of Science databases. From these searches, a screening was carried out, selecting studies that compared the effects of HIIT and SIT protocols on V˙O2max/peak. A total of 19 studies were included in the final analysis. Due to the homogeneity between studies (I2 = 0%), fixed-effects analyses were performed. There was no significant difference in the V˙O2max/peak gains between HIIT and SIT for the standardized mean difference (SMD = 0.150; 95% CI = −0.038 to 0.338; p = 0.119), including studies that presented both measurements in mL·kg−1·min−1 and l·min−1; and raw mean differences (RMD = 0.921 mL·kg−1·min−1; 95% CI = −0.185 to 2.028; p = 0.103) were calculated only with data presented in mL·kg−1·min−1. We conclude that the literature generates very consistent data to confirm that HIIT and SIT protocols promote similar gains in cardiorespiratory fitness. Thus, for this purpose, the choice of the protocol can be made for convenience.

show abstract

“…In terms of exercise performance, it has previously been observed that increased middle-distance sprint kayak performance is accompanied by an increase in aerobic power (O 2 delivery and extraction/consumption by the muscle) ( Paquette et al, 2021 ), anaerobic metabolism ( Papandreou et al, 2020 ), anaerobic power ( Sheykhlouvand et al, 2022 ). Although these parameters significantly increased in both HIIT groups, 500-m and 1,000-m paddling performances only improved in the ASR-HIIT group.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…V̇O 2peak and ventilatory threshold are among the main physiological parameters affecting 500 and 1,000-m sprint kayak performance ( Sheykhlouvand et al, 2022 ; Papandreou et al, 2020 ; Paquette et al, 2018 and Paquette et al, 2021 ; Borges et al, 2015 ; García-Pallarés et al, 2010 ). The increase in V̇O 2peak observed in this study (ASR-HIIT: 6.9 ± 0.6%; MAS-HIIT: 4.8 ± 2.3%) was in agreement with that of previous studies that employed different short-term HIIT regimens ( Rønnestad et al, 2020 ; Sheykhlouvand et al, 2018a , b ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of a paddling-based high-intensity interval training prescribed using anaerobic speed reserve on sprint kayak performance

Tao

2023

Front. Physiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to investigate physiological and performance adaptations to high-intensity interval training (HIIT) prescribed as a proportion of anaerobic speed reserve (ASR) compared to HIIT prescribed using maximal aerobic speed (MAS). Twenty-four highly trained sprint kayak athletes were randomly allocated to one of three 4-weak conditions (N = 8) (ASR-HIIT) two sets of 6 × 60 s intervals at ∆%20ASR (MAS-HIIT) six 2 min paddling intervals at 100% maximal aerobic speed (MAS); or controls (CON) who performed six sessions/week of 1-h traditional endurance paddling at 70%–80% maximum HR. A graded exercise test was performed on a kayak ergometer to determine peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2peak), MAS, V̇O2/HR, and ventilatory threshold. Also, participants completed four consecutive upper-body wingate tests to asses peak and average power output. Significant increases in V̇O2peak (ASR-HIIT = 6.9%, MAS-HIIT = 4.8%), MAS (ASR-HIIT = 7.2%, MAS-HIIT = 4.8%), ASR (ASR-HIIT = −25.1%, MAS-HIIT = −15.9%), upper-body Wingate peak power output and average power output (p < 0.05 for both HIIT groups) were seen compared with pre-training. Also, ASR-HIIT resulted in a significant decrease in 500-m −1.9%, and 1,000−m −1.5% paddling time. Lower coefficient of variation values were observed for the percent changes of the aforementioned factors in response to ASR-HIIT compared to MAS-HIIT. Overall, a short period of ASR-HIIT improves 500-m and 1,000-m paddling performances in highly trained sprint kayak athletes. Importantly, inter-subject variability (CV) of physiological adaptations to ASR-HIIT was lower than MAS-HIIT. Individualized prescription of HIIT using ASR ensures similar physiological demands across individuals and potentially facilitates similar degrees of physiological adaptation.

show abstract

The effect of HIIT vs. SIT on muscle oxygenation in trained sprint kayakers

Cited by 12 publications

References 39 publications

The effect of severe intensity bouts on muscle oxygen saturation responses in trained cyclists

The effect of severe intensity bouts on muscle oxygen saturation responses in trained cyclists

HIIT vs. SIT: What Is the Better to Improve V˙O2max? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effects of a paddling-based high-intensity interval training prescribed using anaerobic speed reserve on sprint kayak performance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About