2022
DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Hemodynamic Parameters on Cerebral Oxygenization During Carotid Endarterectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter proved to be feasible, as highlighted by the absence of protocol violations, and resulted in a clear biological effect indicated by significantly different arterial blood pressures and norepinephrine dosages between the two groups. Although other neuromonitoring tools have been used to detect cerebral hypoperfusion during CEA [14,29,30], we used a NIRS-guided protocol because NIRS is a validated and widely available neuromonitoring technique, easy to use, and can be interpreted without specific training in neurophysiology [6,[14][15][16][17]31]. A systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that NIRS has a low sensitivity, but high specificity to identify intraoperative ischemia compared with awake monitoring in patients undergoing CEA [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter proved to be feasible, as highlighted by the absence of protocol violations, and resulted in a clear biological effect indicated by significantly different arterial blood pressures and norepinephrine dosages between the two groups. Although other neuromonitoring tools have been used to detect cerebral hypoperfusion during CEA [14,29,30], we used a NIRS-guided protocol because NIRS is a validated and widely available neuromonitoring technique, easy to use, and can be interpreted without specific training in neurophysiology [6,[14][15][16][17]31]. A systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that NIRS has a low sensitivity, but high specificity to identify intraoperative ischemia compared with awake monitoring in patients undergoing CEA [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has been introduced as a neuromonitoring tool during carotid artery surgery to track cerebral oxygenation, detect cerebral hypoperfusion [6,14,15], and guide selective shunting [16]. Arterial blood pressure and regional brain tissue oxygenation as measured using NIRS were found to be closely correlated during carotid cross-clamping in patients undergoing CEA [17]. An absolute decrease in regional brain tissue oxygen saturation by 10-20% has been suggested to reflect critical cerebral hypoperfusion [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, higher blood pressure results in better perfusion (concluded from P(j-a)CO 2 ) through the entire period of the carotid artery clamp. It has been a long-time recommendation to keep blood pressure elevated during CEA [ 14 , 15 , 50 ]. Our observations support these suggestions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To adequately monitor cerebral function, CEA is often performed in regional anesthesia, most frequently by cervical plexus block [ 10 ]. Besides the general advantages [ 11 ], operating on awake patients offers hemodynamic benefits, e.g., fewer hypotensive episodes, and thus less vasopressor usage, and consequently better cerebral perfusion [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%