2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2012.00671.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of hemodialysis ultrafiltration on changes in whole blood viscosity

Abstract: Increased whole blood viscosity (WBV) can be injurious to the vascular endothelium and increase the risk of atherothrombotic events. This study examined the effect of hemodialysis ultrafiltration (UF) on WBV, with a focus on high vs. low-volume UF patients. In stable hemodialysis patients, blood was drawn for hematocrit (Hct) and WBV at the start, midpoint, and at the end of dialysis. For analysis, patients were divided into high UF (≥2700 mL) or low UF (<2700 mL) groups. A total of 59 patients completed the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(74 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The (ultra-) filtration-dependent increase in blood viscosity, which we have measured after a single passage of the hemodialysis filter, was much less pronounced at the end of dialysis compared with the value at 60 min behind the filter, but still higher than at 60 min ahead of the filter in our study ( Table 3). The latter effect depends on the (ultra-)filtration rate, meanwhile the effect behind the filter at 60 min and a blood filter rate of 350 ml/min depends on the filtration rate, which is attenuated again by the postdilution substitute These results are in agreement with many other studies [8,11,20,26,35,41].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The (ultra-) filtration-dependent increase in blood viscosity, which we have measured after a single passage of the hemodialysis filter, was much less pronounced at the end of dialysis compared with the value at 60 min behind the filter, but still higher than at 60 min ahead of the filter in our study ( Table 3). The latter effect depends on the (ultra-)filtration rate, meanwhile the effect behind the filter at 60 min and a blood filter rate of 350 ml/min depends on the filtration rate, which is attenuated again by the postdilution substitute These results are in agreement with many other studies [8,11,20,26,35,41].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Also, under -gain will reduce the Doppler signal and cause a significant underestimation of the mean velocity 39 . The presence of plaques and calcifications may lead to a posterior acoustic window or decrease in the Doppler signal, underestimating the velocity measurement 40 .…”
Section: Limitations and Pitfallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this substitution mode may be challenging in certain patient groups, especially in patients with high predialysis hematocrit levels or low vascular access blood flow. Very high hematocrit may be achieved within the dialyzer capillaries in the attempt to force ultrafiltration and to obtain high convective volumes [20, 21]. The resulting hemoconcentration and hyper-viscosity coupled with increased shear stress and high pressure regimen inside the dialyzer is a known risk factor for red cell damage and hemolysis [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very high hematocrit may be achieved within the dialyzer capillaries in the attempt to force ultrafiltration and to obtain high convective volumes [20, 21]. The resulting hemoconcentration and hyper-viscosity coupled with increased shear stress and high pressure regimen inside the dialyzer is a known risk factor for red cell damage and hemolysis [21]. In Mixed-HDF, the pre- and post-dilution substitution rates are adjusted by means of a feedback control system to obtain the maximal filtration fraction within safe pressure and hydraulic conditions, thus preventing progressive hemoconcentration [22, 23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%