1964
DOI: 10.1017/s0021859600063267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of heat treatment in the processing of groundnut meal on the value of the protein for ruminants with some additional experiments on copra

Abstract: 1. Groundnut meals subjected to different degrees of heat treatment during manufacture were fed to lactating goats on nitrogen-balance experiment. The ‘toasted’ groundnut meal was more effective than undenatured or air-dried meals in promoting nitrogen retention.2. The heat treatment of the groundnut meals did not influence the digestibility of the protein.3. The groundnut meals were typed by determining their salt-peptizability giving values ranging from 44% for the ‘toasted’ meal to 80% for the air-dried mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As to which factors are responsible for the better utilization of lucerne hay N in the rumen, it may be stated that neither of the two N sources examined differ markedly either in their amino acid composition or in their solubility in artificial saliva (Table 4). Thus the degree of solubility, which with other feeds has been recognized as the main factor determining the different efficiencies of various proteins such as those of toasted and non-toasted oilseed meals (Chalmers & Synge, 1954;Tagari et al 1962;Chalmers et al 1964), does not appear to play an important part in this instance. However, the great difference in the concentrations of NPN, which formed 25.5% of the total N content of lucerne hay and only 1'5% of that of SBM, may have contributed to the difference in susceptibility of the two sources of nitrogenous substances to the action of rumen micro-organisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As to which factors are responsible for the better utilization of lucerne hay N in the rumen, it may be stated that neither of the two N sources examined differ markedly either in their amino acid composition or in their solubility in artificial saliva (Table 4). Thus the degree of solubility, which with other feeds has been recognized as the main factor determining the different efficiencies of various proteins such as those of toasted and non-toasted oilseed meals (Chalmers & Synge, 1954;Tagari et al 1962;Chalmers et al 1964), does not appear to play an important part in this instance. However, the great difference in the concentrations of NPN, which formed 25.5% of the total N content of lucerne hay and only 1'5% of that of SBM, may have contributed to the difference in susceptibility of the two sources of nitrogenous substances to the action of rumen micro-organisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The two rations investigated contained either lucerne hay or toasted extracted SBM as the main source of digestible protein. Toasted SBM was chosen in preference to the untoasted since the protein contained in toasted meals has been found to be better utilized by the ruminant (Sherrod & Tillman, 1962;Tagari, Ascarelli & Bondi, 1962;Chalmers, Jayasinghe & Marshall, 1964). Cottonseed hulls were given to satisfy the energy requirement of the sheep.…”
Section: Details Vf the Experimental Design Animal Allocation Trementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears that zein resists microbial attack in this way since it has been shown that the majority of zein added to ruminant diets survives unchanged to the duodenum (McDonald, 1954a;Ely, Little, Woolfolk & Mitchell, 1967). Such a low availability in the rumen can be nutritionally advantageous if the protein is digestible in the lower alimentary tract and several methods of treating proteins to protect them from degradation in the rumen have been investigated (Chalmers, Jayasinghe & Marshall, 1964;Leroy, Zelter & Francois, 1964;Ferguson, Hemsley & Reis, 1967). Estimation of the amounts of nucleic acids produced in the rumen seems to offer a useful way of assessing the degree of protection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most promising approach appears to be the chemical modification of good quality protein in such a way as to render it resistant to microbial attack without, at the same time, greatly reducing its nutritive value in the small intestine. Heating protein does reduce its nutritive value for rats (Cama & Morton, 1950;Buraczewski, Buraczewska & Ford, 1967) but nevertheless and Chalmers, Jayasinghe & Marshall (1964), respectively, found that heat-treated casein in diets for sheep and heat-treated groundnut meal in diets for goats gave better overall nitrogen utilization than did the untreated proteins. Lower ammonia concentrations in the rumen with the heated proteins suggested that this was due to decreased degradation in the rumen, the advantages of which presumably outweighed any reduction in orthodox nutritive value.…”
Section: Control Of Protein Degradation In the Rumenmentioning
confidence: 99%