Two growth experiments were conducted to determine the effect of heat on the utilization of ilealdigestible lysine from field peas (Pisurn sutivurn cultivar Dundale) fed to growing pigs. Five lysinedeficient diets (0.36 g ileal-digestible lysine/MJ digestible energy (DE)) were formulated using raw field peas, and field peas heated to either 110", 135", 150", or 165' for 15 min respectively in a forced-air dehydrator. Additional diets were formulated with supplements of free lysine to verify that lysine was limiting in the diets containing the raw peas, and peas heated to 150" or 165". The growth performance and retention of ileal-digestible lysine by pigs given the diets was determined over the 20-45 kg growth phase. Heat had a significant quadratic effect (P < 0-01) on growth rate, with responses declining from 543 g/d with pigs given the raw peas, to 407 g/d for those given the peas heated to 165". Similarly, crude protein deposition declined in a quadratic manner (P < 0.001) from 76 to 36 g/d for pigs fed on raw peas and peas heated to 165" respectively. Retention of ileal-digestible lysine was 0.85 in the pigs given the raw field peas and declined in a quadratic manner (P < 0.001) with the application of heat to 0-48 in those pigs given the peas heated to 165". Pigs fed on field peas heated to 165" had increased (P c 0.05) liver weights. The results indicate that heat applied to protein concentrates, even at mild temperatures, renders lysine in a form that is apparently absorbed but inefficiently utilized by the growing pig. Consequently, ileal digestibility values for lysine in heat-processed meals are unsuitable for diet formulations.
Heat: Ileal digestibility: Lysine utilization: Field peas: PigsThe ileal digestibility of amino acids has been proposed as a means of estimating amino acid availability for pigs. The assumption is made that if an amino acid is not recovered at the terminal ileum, then it has been absorbed in a form that is available to the pig. This assumption has been questioned by recent studies. For example, Batterham et al. (1990a) reported that whilst 0.76 of the ileal-digestible lysine was retained by pigs given soya-bean meal, only 0.36 was retained by pigs given cottonseed meal. They suggested that heat applied to the cottonseed-meal protein may result in lysine being absorbed in a form that was not efficiently utilized. Similar results showing apparent ileal digestibility values overestimating lysine utilization in alternative or heat-processed protein concentrates have been reported by Bellaver & Easter (1989), Moughan et al.