2017
DOI: 10.1109/tci.2017.2686698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Hardware-Computed Travel Time on Localization Accuracy in the Inversion of Experimental (Acoustic) Waveform Data

Abstract: Abstract-This study aims to advance hardware-level computations for travel-time tomography applications in which the wavelength is close to the diameter of the information that has to be recovered. Such can be the case, for example, in the imaging applications of (1) biomedical physics, (2) astro-geophysics and (3) civil engineering. Our aim is to shed light on the effect of that preprocessing the digital waveform signal has on the inversion results and to find computational solutions that guarantee robust inv… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first one of these (i) will enable an enhanced backscattering measurement; our numerical results (Takala et al, 2017a) suggest that with the choice γ = 25 • the accuracy and reliability of the bistatic tomography outcome is superior compared to the monostatic (single-spacecraft) case. The second option (ii) will allow a higher signal-to-noise ratio due to one-way signal paths and tomographic traveltime measurements, performed, e.g., in CONSERT (Takala et al, 2017b;Kofman et al, 2015).…”
Section: Computed Radar Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one of these (i) will enable an enhanced backscattering measurement; our numerical results (Takala et al, 2017a) suggest that with the choice γ = 25 • the accuracy and reliability of the bistatic tomography outcome is superior compared to the monostatic (single-spacecraft) case. The second option (ii) will allow a higher signal-to-noise ratio due to one-way signal paths and tomographic traveltime measurements, performed, e.g., in CONSERT (Takala et al, 2017b;Kofman et al, 2015).…”
Section: Computed Radar Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%