The effect of haptic guidance on curve negotiation behavior of young, experienced drivers

Mulder, M.; Abbink, David A.; Boer, Erwin R.

doi:10.1109/icsmc.2008.4811377

Cited by 99 publications

(87 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Each of these three methods used a twolevel algorithm which was identical to previously published research (Abbink & Mulder, 2009;Mulder, Abbink, & Boer, 2008;Petermeijer et al, 2015a). The first level calculated the desired steering angle based on a two-parameter model that predicts the future lateral error between the lane center and the middle of the car (efuture_lat) and the future heading error of the car (efuture_heading), at a look-ahead time of 0.7 s. The first level was identical for each of the three tested guidance conditions.…”

Section: Designs Of Haptic Steering Guidancementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Does haptic steering guidance instigate speeding? A driving simulator study into causes and remedies

Melman

Winter

Abbink

2017

Accident Analysis & Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

C o v e r i ma g e a d o p t e d f r o m: F o t o k e r e n ( 2 0 1 5 , No v e mb e r ) . Ni g h t h i g h s p e e d c a r f u n [ Di g i t a l i ma g e ] . Re t r i e v e dMa y 2 3 , 2 0 1 6 , f r o m h t t p : / / f o t o k e r e n . n e t / n i g h t -h i g h -s p e e d -c a r -f u n / Driving a car has become a major part of our life. To assist drivers during this task new Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) are developed to increase safety and comfort. In reality, however, these safety benefits are often diminished because of adaptations by the driver, such as adopting a higher speed or driving closer to the vehicle in front. In current literature, I found many theories trying to explain why people adapt, but few studies investigating ways to prevent these negative adaptations from occurring (entire literature study is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/ for more detail). In this MSc. thesis I took the first step from explaining towards preventing behavioral adaptation, with the aim to make novel ADAS more effective in terms of safety.This thesis report is part of the fulfillment for the Master degree of Biomechanical Design at the Delft University of Technology. The driving simulator code, Matlab code used for the data analysis, and statistical analyses have been submitted to the BioMechanical Engineering depository on a USB stick, which is available on request. T. Melman Delft, May 2016iii Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank both my supervisors David Abbink and Joost de Winter for their enthusiasm and support during my MSc. thesis. David always knew how to motivate me, and was there to oversee the bigger picture, whereas Joost, with his keen eye for details, assisted me with tremendous devotion, especially during the last couple of weeks in order to send my thesis to a journal before my graduation. Although we had many memorable discussions, one moment in particular deserves to be mentioned in this acknowledgment; at Sunday evening prior to my experiment, I had some serious concerns. That very same evening, both helped me out, and took these concerns away. Despite the late hour, both were available to help me when I needed them the most. Abstract-An important issue in road traffic safety is that drivers show adverse behavioral adaptation (BA) to driver assistance systems. Haptic steering guidance is an upcoming assistance system which facilitates lane-keeping performance while keeping drivers in the loop, and which may be particularly prone to BA. Thus far, most experiments on haptic steering guidance have measured driver performance while the vehicle speed was kept constant, and so the degree of BA could not be established. The aim of the present driving simulator study was to examine whether haptic steering guidance causes BA in the form of speeding, and to evaluate two types of haptic steering guidance designed not to suffer from BA. Twenty-four participants drove a 1.8 m wide car for 13.9 km on a curved road, with cones demarcating a single 2.2 m narrow lane. Participants comple...

show abstract

Section: Designs Of Haptic Steering Guidancementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The feedback gains were identical to Mulder et al (2008), namely Kf = 2.0, D = 0.08, and P = 0.9. This system guides towards the lane center, instead of guiding away from lane boundaries like several marketed lane-keeping assistance systems do.…”

Section: Continuous Steering Guidance (Cont)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Does haptic steering guidance instigate speeding? A driving simulator study into causes and remedies

Melman

Winter

Abbink

2017

Accident Analysis & Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The actuated steering wheel provided the subject with shared control, which was identical to the look-ahead based haptic guidance controller for curve negotiation used in previously published research (Mulder et al, 2008b). Essentially, the system guides drivers along an optimal path.…”

Section: Shared Control Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These systems are sometimes called haptic guidance systems, or force feedback systems and are essentially dynamic extensions from the static 'virtual fixtures' approach (Rosenberg, 1993). A good example is a lane-keeping assistance system in which a motor acts on the steering wheel by adding torques (Griffiths & Gillespie, 2005;Forsyth & MacLean, 2006;Brandt et al, 2008;Mulder et al, 2008b). Note that the relationship between steering angle and tyre angle remains constant, which has been found to be important for vehicular steering (Toffin et al, 2007).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Neuromuscular Analysis as a Guideline in designing Shared Control

Abbink¹,

Mulder²

2010

Advances in Haptics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Shared control has also been called (continuous) haptic guidance [24], [25] and haptically active controls [16].…”

Section: What Is Shared Control?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Preparing drivers for dangerous situations: A critical reflection on continuous shared control

Winter

Dodou

2011

2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Shared control (also known as continuous haptic guidance or haptically active controls) has recently been introduced in car driving. With shared control, the driver receives continuous force feedback on the gas pedal or steering wheel, so that human and machine conduct the driving task simultaneously. Experiments in driving simulators have shown that shared control reduces control variability and mental workload, and improves accuracy in path tracking and car following. Crucial to road safety, however, is not whether shared control improves performance in routine driving tasks, but what happens in dangerous situations when a conflict of authority occurs, or when the force feedback cannot be relied upon or is suddenly disengaged. Drawing on research into transfer of training, it is shown that shared control may induce aftereffects and may hamper retention of robust driving skills. Supplementary information should not be provided continuously, but on an as-needed basis, warning or assisting drivers only when deviations from acceptable tolerance limits arise.

show abstract

The effect of haptic guidance on curve negotiation behavior of young, experienced drivers

Cited by 99 publications

References 13 publications

Does haptic steering guidance instigate speeding? A driving simulator study into causes and remedies

Does haptic steering guidance instigate speeding? A driving simulator study into causes and remedies

Neuromuscular Analysis as a Guideline in designing Shared Control

Preparing drivers for dangerous situations: A critical reflection on continuous shared control

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About