1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1521-396x(199911)176:1<683::aid-pssa683>3.0.co;2-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Grain Boundaries on Electrical Conductivity in Thin GaN Layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of grain boundary surface trap density (Q r ) should agree with the value of the surface state density of various systems having the same origin. Q r is well in agreement with reported values for both nitride and other polycrystalline systems [15,17,[18][19][20]. The values of Q r decrease with increasing grain size and match the experimental data as expected [15].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The value of grain boundary surface trap density (Q r ) should agree with the value of the surface state density of various systems having the same origin. Q r is well in agreement with reported values for both nitride and other polycrystalline systems [15,17,[18][19][20]. The values of Q r decrease with increasing grain size and match the experimental data as expected [15].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In order to explain different transport behavior in the present samples, we considered the grain boundary model [41,42]. Salzman et al [43,44] showed that the grain boundary model can be applicable to GaN epitaxial films like our case. As can be seen from Table 1, sample A and B have different GaN buffer thicknesses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, mass transportation among particles is often insufficient through sinter treatment, complete particle-particle fusion cannot be achieved within bulk materials, and particle boundaries remain. Owing to internal discontinuities, the properties of sintered inor-ganic bulks are not ideal (11,12), especially with respect to mechanical strength (13). In nature, biological organisms [e.g., sea urchins (14) and coccoliths (15)] can produce inorganic skeletons that have continuous structures with flexible morphology (16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%