2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of government contracts on corporate valuation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result indicates that reasons for gaining government contracts go beyond firm productivity. Consistent with previous empirical evidence, firms that obtain government contracts have lower corporate valuation (Esqueda et al, 2019) and international performance (Lee and Weng, 2013) than firms that do not sell goods and services to governments. In the next section, we provide a conceptual framework that examines more specifically how the level of corruption can moderate the effect of firm productivity on the likelihood of securing a government contract.…”
Section: Background Literaturesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This result indicates that reasons for gaining government contracts go beyond firm productivity. Consistent with previous empirical evidence, firms that obtain government contracts have lower corporate valuation (Esqueda et al, 2019) and international performance (Lee and Weng, 2013) than firms that do not sell goods and services to governments. In the next section, we provide a conceptual framework that examines more specifically how the level of corruption can moderate the effect of firm productivity on the likelihood of securing a government contract.…”
Section: Background Literaturesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is also a performance indicator, but differs from ROA. Tobin's q, which is usually formed as a firm's market value to total book value, appears in Ayturk, Gurbuz and Yanik (2016); Cheng, Chan and Leung (2018) and Esqueda, Ngo and Susnjara (2019) as a measurement for firms' value in corporate finance. Other researches as Martínez-Sola, García-Teruel and Martínez-Solano (2013); Dahya, Dimitrov and McConnell (2008), Saddour (2006) and Bai et al (2004) suggest using market-to-book ratio as another proxy for Tobin's q.…”
Section: Market Based Measurement Of Firm Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, government contractors have lower risk and therefore a lower cost of equity, which the authors explain by the more stable cash flows as an effect of the government as a main customer. Those more stable cashflows seem to weigh more heavily than "any increase in risk due to greater information asymmetry and agency costs" according to Esqueda et al (2019). Esqueda et al (2019) also found that companies, which are predominantly government contractors, tend to have lower valuations than firms without those government contracts.…”
Section: Impact Factor 2: How Innovation Influences a Company's Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those more stable cashflows seem to weigh more heavily than "any increase in risk due to greater information asymmetry and agency costs" according to Esqueda et al (2019). Esqueda et al (2019) also found that companies, which are predominantly government contractors, tend to have lower valuations than firms without those government contracts. On the downside, however, firms that mainly sell their products to the government have a significantly lower sales growth, compared to other companies, which leads to the lower net valuation, as stated above.…”
Section: Impact Factor 2: How Innovation Influences a Company's Valuementioning
confidence: 99%