2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.05.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of glenoid bone loss on reverse shoulder arthroplasty baseplate fixation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These materials were selected in accordance to American Society Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard F1839. Similar foam block densities have been used in prior RSA studies to biomechanically evaluate factors that may impact baseplate fixation, including baseplate design, glenoid bone loss and bone density, and peripheral screws configurations . We found that increasing insertion torque was associated with significantly higher mean baseplate compression across the three surrogate bone densities that were tested, with higher mean baseplate compression observed with increasing surrogate bone density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These materials were selected in accordance to American Society Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard F1839. Similar foam block densities have been used in prior RSA studies to biomechanically evaluate factors that may impact baseplate fixation, including baseplate design, glenoid bone loss and bone density, and peripheral screws configurations . We found that increasing insertion torque was associated with significantly higher mean baseplate compression across the three surrogate bone densities that were tested, with higher mean baseplate compression observed with increasing surrogate bone density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The initial applied torque and baseplate compression are critical to achieve this stable bone‐to‐implant interface. Prior studies have shown that micromotion below 150 µm between an implant and bone is optimal in achieving a biological environment for stable fixation, with subsequent RSA biomechanical studies using this cut‐off as an acceptable level when assessing factors that impact baseplate fixation . Formaini et al inserted and tightened a baseplate to a maximum torque of 3.5 Nm (roughly 31 in‐lbf) with peripheral screws torqued to 0.7 Nm (roughly 6 in‐lbf) and showed that different combinations of hybrid peripheral screw fixation (locking and non‐locking) resulted in secure baseplate fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations