2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11524-012-9735-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Geography on HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections in Tijuana’s Red Light District

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diaries queried a variety of situational determinants previously suggested to play a key role in HIV transmission [12, 3133]. Using closed-ended survey questions, each diary entry assessed mood, and the occurrence of any partnered sexual interaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diaries queried a variety of situational determinants previously suggested to play a key role in HIV transmission [12, 3133]. Using closed-ended survey questions, each diary entry assessed mood, and the occurrence of any partnered sexual interaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal domestic and circular migration and mobility (eg, intraurban or intradistrict mobility, and short-term travel to sex-work hotspots) 33, 34, 35, 36 have been associated with enhanced HIV vulnerability, whereas long durations of mobility and international migration from non-endemic settings have been linked to high rates of condom use 37 and low HIV prevalences. 38 The complexity of migration and HIV is characterised by other geographical features and epidemic structures (eg, immigration or emigration to higher-prevalence settings and rural vs urban migration) that might confer or mitigate HIV risk among FSWs.…”
Section: Structural Determinants Of Hivmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work environments for FSWs are shaped by economic features (eg, economic pressures, client financial incentives for non-condom use, refusal of payment, and bribes or fines by state agents [eg, police] to avoid arrest) resulting from macrostructural forces of poverty, laws, and access to resources and are associated with non-condom use27, 28, 29, 30, 40, 41, 48, 64, 70, 83, 84, 87, 91, 92, 93 and HIV infection among FSWs. 36, 65, 75, 94 Conversely, higher income and absence of economic dependence among FSWs mitigate HIV risks, including increased condom use 40, 48, 80, 86, 87 and lower HIV prevalence. 43, 71, 73, 74, 81, 94 …”
Section: Structural Determinants Of Hivmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 Similarly in Tijuana, Mexico, HIV/STI prevalence was higher among FSWs soliciting sex from the periphery of a red-light district, compared with those within centralized areas, and these FSWs were more likely to experience harassment and exploitation that increased their risk for unsafe sex. 16,17 Mobility may also affect access to HIV prevention and harm reduction services within urban settings. 13,18 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%