1998
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-64575-6_46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of genetic operator probabilities and selection strategies on the performance of a genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such cases the GA would not make significant progress, and also loses valid off springs. They have also shown that the standard selection strategy [10,13], which always keeps both offspring, is shown to have inferior performance on test problems Figure 3 shows a modification of algorithm that incorporates modified keep-best reproduction.It is intuitively clear that KBR has a higher selection pressure than the standard replacement technique of replacing both parents by their two offspring [5,6]. We refer to the latter selection strategy as Standard Selection or short STDS [10].…”
Section: B Modified Keep Best Reproduction Strategy (Mkbr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases the GA would not make significant progress, and also loses valid off springs. They have also shown that the standard selection strategy [10,13], which always keeps both offspring, is shown to have inferior performance on test problems Figure 3 shows a modification of algorithm that incorporates modified keep-best reproduction.It is intuitively clear that KBR has a higher selection pressure than the standard replacement technique of replacing both parents by their two offspring [5,6]. We refer to the latter selection strategy as Standard Selection or short STDS [10].…”
Section: B Modified Keep Best Reproduction Strategy (Mkbr)mentioning
confidence: 99%