2008
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2007-0913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Genetic Merit and Production System on Dairy Cow Fertility, Measured Using Progesterone Profiles and On-Farm Recording

Abstract: The recent decline in dairy cow fertility appears to be a feature of several countries and is often linked to increased milk production, but its causes are not always obvious. A fully recorded 200-cow dairy herd, split into 2 genetic lines maintained on 2 production systems, was used to investigate the relationship between several measures of fertility, production, and energy balance. The 2 genetic lines were composed of a selection line, derived from the highest genetic merit bulls available, and a control li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
42
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(30 reference statements)
10
42
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Phenotypic performance Mean phenotypic fertility performance in the present study was similar to previous reports from Ireland (Horan et al, 2005), the UK (Pollot and Coffey, 2008), the Netherlands (Veerkamp et al, 2000) and Sweden (Petersson et al, 2006), all of which included some of the data used in the present study. However, the mean CLA was longer in the present study compared with the aforementioned studies, but this is more than likely attributable to only first parity animals being included in the present study unlike the other studies, with the exception of Veerkamp et al (2000), which included pluriparae as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Phenotypic performance Mean phenotypic fertility performance in the present study was similar to previous reports from Ireland (Horan et al, 2005), the UK (Pollot and Coffey, 2008), the Netherlands (Veerkamp et al, 2000) and Sweden (Petersson et al, 2006), all of which included some of the data used in the present study. However, the mean CLA was longer in the present study compared with the aforementioned studies, but this is more than likely attributable to only first parity animals being included in the present study unlike the other studies, with the exception of Veerkamp et al (2000), which included pluriparae as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Phenotypic data were available on 2031 Irish, 1018 UK, 725 Dutch and 225 Swedish primiparous Holstein cows. A detailed description of the experimental treatments imposed on the animals in the different countries is provided elsewhere (Veerkamp et al, 2000;Horan et al, 2005;Petersson et al, 2006;Pollot and Coffey, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More than 25% of cows show a prolonged luteal phase. This is consistent with a higher incidence of short C-LA as the cows experiencing a shorter interval to C-LA are more likely to experience a longer first luteal phase (Royal et al, 2002;Grimard and Disenhaus, 2005;Horan et al, 2005;Petersson et al, 2007;Pollott and Coffey, 2008). The extent to which this effect has a genetic basis is not clear.…”
Section: Milk Production and Reproductive Performancementioning
confidence: 80%
“…The cattle were housed at Langhill Farm, Roslin, Midlothian (55°52'1"N, 3°10'15"W), hereafter 'Farm 1', until late June 2002 and then transferred to Crichton Royal Farm, Dumfries (55°02' N, 3°34' W), 'Farm 2', a distance of 95 km. The management systems are described for Farm 1 in Veerkamp et al (1994) and for Farm 2 in Pollott and Coffey (2008). Briefly, two genetic lines were created in 1976: select (S) and control (C).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%