1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7757(97)00049-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of gender composition of faculty on student retention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
59
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We conjecture that the higher is the representation of women in the form of fellow students or faculty the greater will be the academic success of female students as the former will help create a support group and a network, while the latter will act as role models. Empirical research finds mixed support for the role model hypothesis (see for instance Canes and Rosen 1995;Jacobs 1996;Robst et al 1998).…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conjecture that the higher is the representation of women in the form of fellow students or faculty the greater will be the academic success of female students as the former will help create a support group and a network, while the latter will act as role models. Empirical research finds mixed support for the role model hypothesis (see for instance Canes and Rosen 1995;Jacobs 1996;Robst et al 1998).…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, most prior evidence on the effects of a same-gender teacher has focused on postsecondary and graduate settings (for example. Canes and Rosen 1995;Rothstein 1995;Neumark and Gardecki 1998;Robst, Keil, and Russo 1998;and Bettinger and Long 2005). The conclusions from these studies are quite mixed as are the ones from the fewer studies that have examined the effect of a teacher's gender in high-school settings.…”
Section: Gender Gaps and Teachersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personal characteristics such as gender and age; or individual abilities; income, education and socio-economic status of the family, academic-specific factors (services, quality in teaching, etc), and time-varying variables such as number of passed exams or credits are found to affect student choices at university (Arulampalam et al, 2004;Arulampalam et al, 2005;Checchi & Flabbi, 2006;Johnes, 1990;Light & Strayer, 2000;Robst et al, 1998;Smith & Naylor, 2001; among others).…”
Section: Wwwccsenetorg/ijspmentioning
confidence: 99%