The Effect of Gaze Direction and Gender on the Gaze Avoidance of Social Anxiety Individuals

Park, J.; Lee, Jin-suk

doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.249

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Collectively, the factors that impact the GCE have been categorised into three major types: the observer, the cueing face and the relationship between the two (Dalmaso et al, 2020). Speci cally, the observer refers to the effect of individual differences, such as gender (Bayliss et al, 2005), age (Slessor et al, 2008), personal traits (Park & Lee, 2016) and internal states (Wilkowski et al, 2009), on the GCE. The cueing face refers to how facial features, such as facial expressions (McCrackin et al, 2019), face dominance (Jones et al, 2011) and facial attractiveness (Roth et al, 2021), affect individuals' GCEs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social excluder’s face reduces gaze-triggered attention orienting

Yang,

Zhou,

2024

Psychological Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social ostracism, a negative affective experience in interpersonal interactions, is thought to modulate the gaze-cueing effect (GCE). However, it is unclear whether the impact of social exclusion on the GCE is related to the identity of the cueing face. Therefore, the present study employed a two-phase paradigm to address this issue. In the rst phase, two groups of participants were instructed to complete a Cyberball game with two virtual avatars to establish a binding relationship between a speci c face's identity and the emotions of social exclusion or inclusion. In the second phase, these two virtual avatars (exclusion faces/inclusion faces) and two new faces (control faces) were used as cueing faces in the gaze-cueing task. The results found that, for the exclusion group, the magnitudes of the GCEs for the exclusion and exclusion-control faces were similar in the 200 ms stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) condition, while the exclusion face's GCE was signi cantly smaller than that of the exclusion-control face in the 700 ms SOA condition. In contrast, for the inclusion group, the GCEs for inclusion and inclusion-control faces in both the 200 ms SOA and 700 ms SOA conditions were no signi cant difference. This study reveals that the effect of social exclusion on the GCE is related to the identity of the cueing face, with individuals more reluctant to follow the gaze direction of excluder and shift their attention and provides experimental evidence that the perception of higher social relations can exert a top-down impact on the processing of social spatial cues.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social excluder’s face reduces gaze-triggered attention orienting

Yang,

Zhou,

2024

Psychological Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Social Excluder’s Face Reduces Gaze-Triggered Attention Orienting

Yang

Zhou²,

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social ostracism, a negative affective experience in interpersonal interactions, is thought to modulate the gaze-cueing effect (GCE). However, it is unclear whether the impact of social exclusion on the GCE is related to the identity of the cueing face. Therefore, the present study employed a two-phase paradigm to address this issue. In the first phase, two groups of participants were instructed to complete a Cyberball game with two virtual avatars to establish a binding relationship between a specific face’s identity and the emotions of social exclusion or inclusion. In the second phase, these two virtual avatars (exclusion faces/inclusion faces) and two new faces (control faces) were used as cueing faces in the gaze-cueing task. The results found that, for the exclusion group, the magnitudes of the GCEs for the exclusion and exclusion-control faces were similar in the 200 ms stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) condition, while the exclusion face’s GCE was significantly smaller than that of the exclusion-control face in the 700 ms SOA condition. In contrast, for the inclusion group, the GCEs for inclusion and inclusion-control faces in both the 200 ms SOA and 700 ms SOA conditions were no significant difference. This study reveals that the effect of social exclusion on the GCE is related to the identity of the cueing face, with individuals more reluctant to follow the gaze direction of excluder and shift their attention and provides experimental evidence that the perception of higher social relations can exert a top-down impact on the processing of social spatial cues.

show abstract

The Effect of Gaze Direction and Gender on the Gaze Avoidance of Social Anxiety Individuals

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Social excluder’s face reduces gaze-triggered attention orienting

Social excluder’s face reduces gaze-triggered attention orienting

Social Excluder’s Face Reduces Gaze-Triggered Attention Orienting

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About