2005
DOI: 10.1002/jsc.713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of future redeployment on organizational trust

Abstract: ᭹This study compares levels of organizational trust and connected variables between two groups of employees from an Australian public health organization. ᭹ One group ( N = 123) is based in a hospital that will close as part of the organization's transformational strategy, and the other group ( N = 152) is based in other hospitals that will remain open. The first group will become redeployed amongst departments in the remaining hospitals. ᭹The relationships between trust, transformational leadership, fairness,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, studies have replicated the POSaffective commitment relationship in diverse samples including Canadian employees (Aubé et al 2007;Lapalme et al 2009;Quenneville et al 2010) and military service members (Dobreva-Martinova et al 2002), temporary workers in Belgium (Camerman et al 2007), Korean employees (e.g., Lee and Peccei 2007;Yoon and Thye 2002), contracting-organization employees in the United Kingdom (Coyle-Shapiro and Morrow 2006), attorneys in Hong Kong (Loi et al 2006), university faculty members (Van Knippenberg and Sleebos 2006) in the Netherlands, employees in China (e.g., Chen et al 2005;Hui et al 2004), employees in Taiwan (Chiu et al 2005), pharmaceutical sales representatives in India (Moideenkutty et al 2001), Australian hospital workers (Ferres et al 2005), and alumni from a Belgian University (Stinglhamber and Vandenberghe 2003). In all these studies (and others with similar findings, see Table 1), the relationship between POS and affective commitment to the organization was strong and positive, suggesting that the norm of reciprocity and the influence of POS on employees' organizational commitment generalize globally.…”
Section: Pos and Affective Commitment In Non-us Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, studies have replicated the POSaffective commitment relationship in diverse samples including Canadian employees (Aubé et al 2007;Lapalme et al 2009;Quenneville et al 2010) and military service members (Dobreva-Martinova et al 2002), temporary workers in Belgium (Camerman et al 2007), Korean employees (e.g., Lee and Peccei 2007;Yoon and Thye 2002), contracting-organization employees in the United Kingdom (Coyle-Shapiro and Morrow 2006), attorneys in Hong Kong (Loi et al 2006), university faculty members (Van Knippenberg and Sleebos 2006) in the Netherlands, employees in China (e.g., Chen et al 2005;Hui et al 2004), employees in Taiwan (Chiu et al 2005), pharmaceutical sales representatives in India (Moideenkutty et al 2001), Australian hospital workers (Ferres et al 2005), and alumni from a Belgian University (Stinglhamber and Vandenberghe 2003). In all these studies (and others with similar findings, see Table 1), the relationship between POS and affective commitment to the organization was strong and positive, suggesting that the norm of reciprocity and the influence of POS on employees' organizational commitment generalize globally.…”
Section: Pos and Affective Commitment In Non-us Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…while Ferres et al, (2005) discovered that employees trust in management was related to perceptions of transformational leadership and procedural justice.…”
Section: Neves and Caetano (2009) Demonstrated How Trust In Their Supmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cursory search of organizational research in the last 5 years in hospital settings generated a concerning number of published studies done this way, many by well-known scholars (e.g., Benoit-Barné & Cooren, 2009;Bordia, Jones, Gallois, Callan, & DiFonzo, 2006;Coyle-Shapiro, Kessler, & Purcell, 2004;Doorewaard & Brouns, 2003;Ferres, Connell, & Travaglione, 2005;Goodier & Eisenberg, 2006;Grice, Gallois, Jones, Paulsen, & Callen, 2007;Jamal & Baba, 2003;Kaplan & Patel, 2008;Lewis, 2000;Murray & Peyrefitte, 2007;Rooney, Paulson, Callan, Barbant, Gallois & Jones, 2010). Few pay attention to context.…”
Section: Generalizing To Other Organizational Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%