The Effect of Full-Mouth Rehabilitation on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life for Children with Special Health Care Needs

Meligy, Omar El; Maashi, Manal; Almushayt, Abdullah S.; Alnowaiser, Abeer M; AlMubark, Sultan

doi:10.17796/1053-4628-40.1.53

Cited by 33 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 11 articles were excluded. After evaluating the texts comprehensively, all 21 articles were included in the meta‐analysis . Within the same publication, one study contributed to the meta‐analysis twice because both the ECOHIS and COHRQoL questionnaires were used .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Only five studies indicated the reasons for DGA, primarily due to fear, anxiety, and behavioural issues . All of the studies included healthy subjects with the exception of one study, which included patients with mental and physical disability . Patient socio‐economic status was not determined in any of the studies.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…After evaluating the texts comprehensively, all 21 articles were included in the meta-analysis. 3,14,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] Within the same publication, one study contributed to the meta-analysis twice because both the ECOHIS and COHRQoL questionnaires were used. 37 In addition, within the same publication, another study utilised the COHRQoL questionnaire in two different groups.…”

Section: Literature Searchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…14,20,23,24,29 All of the studies included healthy subjects with the exception of one study, which included patients with mental and physical disability. 27 Patient socio-economic status was not determined in any of the studies. The dental treatment was shown to be comprehensive in nature (eg, composite restoration, pulp therapy, stainless steel crown, and/or extraction).…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The family impact of dental general anaesthesia in children: A meta‐analysis

Park

Anthonappa

King

et al. 2018

Int J Paed Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The health and well‐being of children are intimately linked to their parents’ physical, emotional, and social health and social circumstances. Aim To conduct a meta‐analysis of studies that have used the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) and Child Oral Health‐Related Quality of Life (COHRQoL) instruments, to evaluate the family impact scale (FIS) changes following their children's dental treatment under general anaesthesia (DGA). Methodology A systematic search was undertaken using the PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria consisted of patients below 16 years of age, DGA, pre‐ and post‐operative assessments, and the use of ECOHIS and COHRQoL. FIS changes were the primary outcome measure, where the mean difference (MD) was calculated. Results After initial search of 105 studies in the database, twenty‐one articles were included in the analysis. A positive outcome in the FIS changes was identified in all studies. The combined MD for FIS using ECOHIS and COHRQoL was 1.52 [95% CI: 1.15‐1.89; P < 0.00001; I2=87%] and 1.10 [95% CI: 0.68‐1.52; P < 0.00001; I2=79%], respectively. Conclusions Dental treatment with general anaesthesia for children had a significant positive impact on parental emotions, activity, and conflict. Following DGA, there was significant improvement in the FIS, with large MD.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Searchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The family impact of dental general anaesthesia in children: A meta‐analysis

Park

Anthonappa

King

et al. 2018

Int J Paed Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Treatment of children with dental caries is usually a challenging procedure because the Pediatric dentist is required to possess operative skills as well as psychological management ones [1] . When the clinician is faced with uncooperative children, physical or mental disabled children, or ones with early childhood caries demanding more than multiple procedures, then one session treatment under GA seems to be an agreeable option [2] . The advantages of GA is to provide dental treatment in one setting with minimal psychological stress on the child.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of children’s oral health-related quality of life following full mouth rehabilitation under general anaesthesia in a group of Egyptian children

Elkhadem

Nagi

2019

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives:This study was performed on children and their families. The main aim was to discover the effect of dental treatment under general anaesthesia (GA) on quality of life in both children and their guardians. Patients and Methods:The sample included a consecutive number of children receiving full mouth rehabilitation under GA. An interview was performed to the guardian's pre and postoperative. The interview consisted of a series of questions that examined the effect of dental caries on both the child and their guardians. Two scales were used in the process; the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) to measure the impact of dental caries on children quality of life, and visual analogue scale (VAS) to measure guardian's satisfaction following GA. Results:This study included 100 children and their guardians. The mean age for the whole sample was 4.5 years. The ratio of males to female children was 56:44. Regarding the results from ECOHIS, there was a statistically significant post-operative decrease in: complains from teeth, sensitivity with hot and cold, sensitivity from sweets, difficulty in pronouncing some words, time off from school or day-care due to pain, sleeping problems and behaviour problems. As for guardians, there was a statistically significant postoperative decrease in the feeling of being guilty towards their children welfare, the extra-care required for the child, the income loss and the worry about the child's future. Most of the parents (87%) regarded the GA experience as being positive, and 85% of caregivers would recommend GA as a treatment option for full mouth rehabilitation in children. Conclusions:The choice of GA as a treatment option for children with early childhood caries results in significant improvement in quality of life for both the children and their guardians.(3046)

show abstract

Oral health-related quality of life changes in children following dental treatment under general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Effect of Full-Mouth Rehabilitation on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life for Children with Special Health Care Needs

Abstract: Treating CSHCN under GA, with 3-month recall visits for the patients, had a significant long-term effect on their OHRQoL extending up to 12 months postoperatively.

Cited by 33 publications

References 18 publications

The family impact of dental general anaesthesia in children: A meta‐analysis

The family impact of dental general anaesthesia in children: A meta‐analysis

Assessment of children’s oral health-related quality of life following full mouth rehabilitation under general anaesthesia in a group of Egyptian children

Oral health-related quality of life changes in children following dental treatment under general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About