2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2009.4960674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of formant trajectories and phoneme durations on vowel intelligibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each word was repeated 16 times spoken in CNV, CNV/SLOW, CLR/FAST and CLR styles; intelligibility was previously examined in [2]. The total of 320 (5 words × 4 styles × 16 repetitions) samples were analyzed.…”
Section: Results Of Formant Contour Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each word was repeated 16 times spoken in CNV, CNV/SLOW, CLR/FAST and CLR styles; intelligibility was previously examined in [2]. The total of 320 (5 words × 4 styles × 16 repetitions) samples were analyzed.…”
Section: Results Of Formant Contour Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intelligibility of CLR speech is known to be higher than that of conversational (CNV) speech, which is spoken as if talking with a colleague [1]. Previously, vowel intelligibility of CNV speech was significantly improved by modifying formant contours to resemble those of CLR speech [2]. The condition where formant steady-state values of CNV speech were matched to those of CLR speech was effective, without modifying phoneme durations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%