2019
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggz011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of fluid compressibility and elastic rock properties on deformation of geothermal reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the fluid volume in the crack can be larger than VDef because of the compressibility difference between hydrothermal fluid and surrounding rock (e.g., Rivalta and Segall 2008). Poroelasticity of the surrounding rock also affect the estimation of the actual fluid volume (e.g., Juncu et al 2019). Moreover, the fluid can be much denser than assumed above, if the fluid is supercritical or a liquid phase.…”
Section: Deflation During Phasementioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the fluid volume in the crack can be larger than VDef because of the compressibility difference between hydrothermal fluid and surrounding rock (e.g., Rivalta and Segall 2008). Poroelasticity of the surrounding rock also affect the estimation of the actual fluid volume (e.g., Juncu et al 2019). Moreover, the fluid can be much denser than assumed above, if the fluid is supercritical or a liquid phase.…”
Section: Deflation During Phasementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Among them the β f can greatly vary depending on the phase state, that is, a single vapor, single liquid, or two-phase liquid-vapor state (Grant and Sorey 1979). If we can estimate β f , we may be able to obtain some information about the phase state of the reservoir (Mastin et al 2009;Kozono et al 2013;Hreinsdóttir et al 2014;Juncu et al 2017Juncu et al , 2019.…”
Section: Implications For the Thermodynamic State Of The Deflated Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, understanding the reservoir state is crucial to evaluating the risk of such hazards. While the estimation of the reservoir state based on a combination of ground deformation and discharge mass data has been made in several geothermal areas (Hreinsdóttir et al 2014;Juncu et al 2017Juncu et al , 2019, there are few case studies regarding active volcanoes. It is necessary to increase detailed studies for other active volcanoes with high risks of phreatic eruption and landslide.…”
Section: Implications For the Thermodynamic State Of The Deflated Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its pressure change ( P ) value is too large to be realistic, as we show below. In the following discussions, we assume that the rigidity ( µ ) of the host rock is as low as 0.1-1.0 GPa, a realistic value for hydrothermally altered volcanoes and geothermal fields at shallow depths (e.g., Lynne et al 2013;Juncu et al 2019). The estimated value of �P/µ (2.23) requires P to be more than 230 MPa, which greatly exceeds the tensile strength of hydrothermally altered rock (1-10 MPa, Kumar et al 2011).…”
Section: Source Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%