2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of flame structure on soot formation and transport in turbulent nonpremixed flames using direct numerical simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
62
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Shaddix et al found that soot production increased fourfold for a flickering methane/air flame as compared with a steady flame at the same mean fuel flow velocity [10]. Temporally and spatially resolved data are needed that can contribute to the validation of direct numerical simulation studies, which capture the effects of local curvature, strain, and the duration of interaction between flow structures and flames on soot formation and evolution in turbulent nonpremixed flames [8,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Shaddix et al found that soot production increased fourfold for a flickering methane/air flame as compared with a steady flame at the same mean fuel flow velocity [10]. Temporally and spatially resolved data are needed that can contribute to the validation of direct numerical simulation studies, which capture the effects of local curvature, strain, and the duration of interaction between flow structures and flames on soot formation and evolution in turbulent nonpremixed flames [8,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier DNS studies of luminous turbulent flames employed semi-empirical soot models (Lignell et al 2007;Yoo and Im 2007b;Narayanan and Trouvé 2009), which require only a small number (usually two) of additional transport equations. Such models are computationally efficient and robust, but require problem-dependent modifications of the physical parameters in order to match experimental data, and hence have limited predictive capability and generality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These laboratory-scale laminar and turbulent flame studies can reveal important physical characteristics of fundamental combustion processes in practical devices. Recent combustion DNS studies incorporated advanced multi-physics models to describe soot formation, radiative heat transfer, and spray evaporation, providing temporally and spatially resolved combustion events with detailed information of turbulence-flame interaction characteristics [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%