2021
DOI: 10.1108/mf-08-2020-0442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of firm-specific litigation risk on independent director conservatism

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine whether firm-specific litigation risk affects independent director conservatism in the oversight of financial reporting.Design/methodology/approachThis study considers the enactment of Sarbanes–Oxley Act and the main US stock exchanges' corresponding corporate governance regulations in 2002–2003 as an exogenous shock event to increase board independence. OLS regressions with fixed effects are conducted to test the hypothesis.FindingsChanges in discretionary accrua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We add a control variable for auditor change ( AuditorCHG it ) because research has noted that firms having changed auditors appear more likely to have internal control difficulties (Ashbaugh et al , 2007). A categorical variable for having received a going-concern opinion ( GC it ) is also added, because it signifies an increased likelihood of litigation (DeFond and Jiambalvo, 1994; Liu and Sun, 2022). Companies with a “Big 4” auditor have been found to be less likely to report internal control problems (Ge and McVay, 2005), and troubled client firms are less likely to be able to afford the larger audit firms (Zhang et al , 2007); firms that restructure often exhibit generalized instability and disarray (Doyle et al , 2007b).…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We add a control variable for auditor change ( AuditorCHG it ) because research has noted that firms having changed auditors appear more likely to have internal control difficulties (Ashbaugh et al , 2007). A categorical variable for having received a going-concern opinion ( GC it ) is also added, because it signifies an increased likelihood of litigation (DeFond and Jiambalvo, 1994; Liu and Sun, 2022). Companies with a “Big 4” auditor have been found to be less likely to report internal control problems (Ge and McVay, 2005), and troubled client firms are less likely to be able to afford the larger audit firms (Zhang et al , 2007); firms that restructure often exhibit generalized instability and disarray (Doyle et al , 2007b).…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have provided evidence regarding how board independence and board diligence lead to sound corporate governance (Goh, 2009;Lin and Hwang, 2010). Abbott et al (2004) indicate that the independence and meeting frequency (a proxy for diligence) of the audit committee directors can effectively reduce the occurrence of accounting restatements in the USA, and researchers also report that litigation concerns have a significant effect on director behavior (Donelson et al, 2022;Liu and Sun, 2022). Ferris et al (2003) report that holding multiple directorships does not increase the likelihood of fraud litigation, and Liu et al (2021) find that directors on multiple boards allocate comparatively more effort to the directorships where they more effectively reduce risk.…”
Section: Influence Of Board Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This monitoring role is supported by Sun and Liu (2011)'s finding that firms tend to be more conservative in accounting methods when they are followed by more analysts than when they are followed by fewer analysts. Consistent with the risk adjustment mechanism, independent directors are more conservative in overseeing financial reporting when they face higher litigation risk due to liability risk (Liu and Sun, 2021). In sum, the manager's implementation of conservatism is sometimes in line with stakeholders by providing shield from competitive attack in the product market, but at times demanded to limit managerial opportunism.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%