1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)63115-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Finasteride on the Risk of Acute Urinary Retention and the Need for Surgical Treatment Among Men With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
260
3
18

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(291 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
10
260
3
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Lepor et al (1996) have reported that a combination of terazosin, an α 1 -adrenoceptor antagonist, and finasteride has no greater beneficial effect in BPH patients than terazosin alone. However, subsequent studies (McConnell et al 1998;Marberger 1998) have demonstrated that longterm treatment with finasteride offers advantages in patients with very large prostates, suggesting the possibility that Z-350 could be superior to other α 1 -adrenoceptor antagonists for long-term treatment of certain BPH patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lepor et al (1996) have reported that a combination of terazosin, an α 1 -adrenoceptor antagonist, and finasteride has no greater beneficial effect in BPH patients than terazosin alone. However, subsequent studies (McConnell et al 1998;Marberger 1998) have demonstrated that longterm treatment with finasteride offers advantages in patients with very large prostates, suggesting the possibility that Z-350 could be superior to other α 1 -adrenoceptor antagonists for long-term treatment of certain BPH patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several randomized clinical trials have confirmed the tolerability and safety of long-term finasteride treatment [59,77,78]. In particular, the PLESS (Proscar LongTerm Efficacy and Safety) study, which involved 3040 male BPH patients over 4 years reported that the drop-out rate was higher in the placebo group (42 %) in comparison with the finasteride-treated group (34 %) [79].…”
Section: Adverse Effects Of 5α-rs Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a majority of patients, finasteride (5 mg/day) leads to significant reductions in symptom severity, improvement of urinary flow rate, reduction of prostate volume and risk of acute urinary retention, as well as a reduction of the need for surgical intervention [58,59]. Likewise, dutasteride has been shown to result in similar therapeutic effects as finasteride [60][61][62].…”
Section: Therapeutic Efficacy Of 5α-r Inhibitors In Bphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aus dieser Präparatgruppe ist sowohl ein selektiver Inhibitor der 5α-Reduktase Typ II (Finasterid) wie auch ein Inhibitor beider Isoenzyme (Typ I und Typ II; Dutasterid) am Markt. Die Effizienz beider Präparate wurde in prospektiven randomisierten Studien untersucht, wobei für Dutasterid Daten über 4 Jahre, für Finasterid über bis zu 4,5 Jahren vorliegen [3,7,10,11,12,13]. Soweit derzeit beurteilbar ist die klinische Effizienz beider Präparate vergleichbar [3,7,10,11,12,13].…”
Section: α-Reduktaseinhibitorenunclassified
“…Abb. 6;[3,7,11,12,13]). Diese Präparate sind demnach in der Lage, in den natürlichen Verlauf der Erkrankung einzugreifen.…”
unclassified