2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-003-0594-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of female arrivals on mate monopolization in the yellow dung fly

Abstract: The degree of resource monopolization relates to the distribution of resources in space and time. In general, monopolization is predicted to be high when resources (food or mates) are clumped in space, dispersed in time, and predictable in space or time. Using the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria (Diptera: Scathophagidae), we qualitatively tested a general model that predicts the distribution of mating success among competing males based on the temporal pattern of female arrivals relative to mating tim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, population demography (e.g. male density , Borgia 1980;McLain 1992; operational sex ratio, Blanckenhorn et al 2003), individual state (e.g. energy levels, Marden and Waage 1990;Plaistow and Siva-Jothy 1996), local environmental conditions (e.g.…”
Section: Traits Representing Male Dominance and Resource Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, population demography (e.g. male density , Borgia 1980;McLain 1992; operational sex ratio, Blanckenhorn et al 2003), individual state (e.g. energy levels, Marden and Waage 1990;Plaistow and Siva-Jothy 1996), local environmental conditions (e.g.…”
Section: Traits Representing Male Dominance and Resource Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, one should examine all three of the above said relationships concurrently in a single experimental study to control for factors known to influence a male's tenure on a resource (operational sex ratio, Blanckenhorn et al 2003; population demography: e.g. male density, Borgia 1980;McLain 1992; ecological factors: e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in the non‐competitive experiment small‐line males had the highest mating success, an unusual outcome, large‐line males did best in the competitive group experiment, as is typically the case (Borgia 1980; Jann et al. 2000; Blanckenhorn et al. 2003a, b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This 1:1 sex ratio in principle allowed each male to obtain a female, guaranteeing a high probability of copulating and hence sperm use for most males (cf. Blanckenhorn et al 2003b). However, in practice several females were not mated, e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation