1953
DOI: 10.2527/jas1953.12124x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Feeding Sucrose to Beef Cattle and Swine on the Dressing Percentage and Quality of Meat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

1964
1964
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This illustrates the importance of typical flavour of the normal product in influencing the choice of several of the participants. In contrast to the findings of MacDougall and Rhodes (1977) and of this study, earlier workers reported that cooked 'sucrose-fed' liver had both a better texture and flavour than did normal liver (Wilcox, Merkley, Galloway, Greenwood, Binns, Bennett and Harris, 1953) or was 'sweeter and more attractive' when fried or processed into pate (Madsen, 1943). On the other hand, 11 consumers commented favourably on the stronger flavour of the normal liver and 10 others commented unfavourably on lack (1) Tasteless (2) flavour (11) Lower cooking loss (1) Too friable (2) Lower cooking Strong flavour (3) loss (2) of flavour in sugar-fed livers.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This illustrates the importance of typical flavour of the normal product in influencing the choice of several of the participants. In contrast to the findings of MacDougall and Rhodes (1977) and of this study, earlier workers reported that cooked 'sucrose-fed' liver had both a better texture and flavour than did normal liver (Wilcox, Merkley, Galloway, Greenwood, Binns, Bennett and Harris, 1953) or was 'sweeter and more attractive' when fried or processed into pate (Madsen, 1943). On the other hand, 11 consumers commented favourably on the stronger flavour of the normal liver and 10 others commented unfavourably on lack (1) Tasteless (2) flavour (11) Lower cooking loss (1) Too friable (2) Lower cooking Strong flavour (3) loss (2) of flavour in sugar-fed livers.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Undoubtedly, the need to consider the time factor in relation to sugar feeding explains the inconsistent results relating to muscle ultimate pH following the administration of sucrose to pigs prior to slaughter (Wilcox, Merkley, Galloway, Greenwood, Binns, Bennett and Harris, 1953;Kitchell and Ingram, 1962). This is not contrary to expectation since the enhanced glycogen stores built up in the liver as a result of sucrose ingestion would be released to the peripheral circulation during the latter part of the subsequent 'water-only' regime, by which time influx of fructose and glucose to the liver from the intestinal tract would be greatly diminished or have ceased.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several workers have fed pigs with solid sucrose prior to slaughter but their results, obtained under different experimental conditions, have been variable. In the study of Wilcox, Merkley, Galloway, Greenwood, Binns, Bennett and Harris (1953), feeding of sucrose for up to 3 days prior to slaughter increased carcass yield in relation to that of pigs slaughtered in an exhausted condition immediately after arrival at the abattoir. In the study of Wilcox, Merkley, Galloway, Greenwood, Binns, Bennett and Harris (1953), feeding of sucrose for up to 3 days prior to slaughter increased carcass yield in relation to that of pigs slaughtered in an exhausted condition immediately after arrival at the abattoir.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%