2015
DOI: 10.22495/cocv13i1c10p2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of family control and management on performance, capital structure, cash holding, and cash dividends

Abstract: This study investigates the effect of family firm on corporate performance and financial policy (capital structure, cash holding, and cash dividends). Using a sample of Brazilian firms, the study uses a treatment effect model to address self-selection and endogeneity problems. The results show that family firm has a negative net effect on performance. Family control has an effect on financial policies that indicate a aversive behavior to preserve control. The results indicate less problem of free cash flow and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is consistent with Setia-Atmaja (2010), Isakov and Weisskopf (2015), Gong (2015) and Huang et al (2012). However, the dividend decision may reflect the risk profile of the family or difficulty in assessing external financing (Portal and Basso, 2015). Anderson and Hamadi (2009) suggest that due to maintain control and reducing the need to dilute control, the family enterprise might decide to keep high level of cash holding and thus low the dividends.…”
Section: Dividend Policysupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is consistent with Setia-Atmaja (2010), Isakov and Weisskopf (2015), Gong (2015) and Huang et al (2012). However, the dividend decision may reflect the risk profile of the family or difficulty in assessing external financing (Portal and Basso, 2015). Anderson and Hamadi (2009) suggest that due to maintain control and reducing the need to dilute control, the family enterprise might decide to keep high level of cash holding and thus low the dividends.…”
Section: Dividend Policysupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The advantages and disadvantages of the family firm co-exist (Wei et al, 2011), and the ultimate effect of family control/management on the financial decision making process depends on the extend of family involvement in management, which dictates the cost and net benefits that are dominant in family firms (Portal, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The involvement of family members in boards of director can also influence how family firms shape their capital structure decisions. Moussa and Elgiziry (2019) and Portal and Basso (2015) find that the presence of family members on the board enhances the controlling power of families, allowing them to better influence firm decisions. Similarly, Hansen and Block (2020) conclude that board involvement allows family owners to have more power to pursue their objectives at the cost of minority shareholders.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we examine how family involvement in the board of directors can affect the capital structure of family firms. According to Comino-Jurado et al (2021), Moussa and Elgiziry (2019), and Portal and Basso (2015), the presence of family members on the board can enhance the controlling power of families, allowing them to better influence firm decisions. Therefore, family firms with board involvement tend to use more debt to increase firm value and avoid losing control to external shareholders.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%