2007
DOI: 10.1002/app.25753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of fabrication methods on the mechanical and thermal properties of poly(lactide‐co‐glycolide) scaffolds

Abstract: The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effects of the fabrication method, poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) molecular weight, and PEG concentration on the mechanical and thermal properties of blended poly (lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA)/PEG scaffolds. The manufacturing process was the dominant factor. The tested fabrication processes were compression, heat molding, and solvent casting/vacuum drying. The scaffolds produced by compression were strong and brittle with mechanical properties [compressive modulus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, microparticles composed of a blend of PLG and PEG exhibited a higher T g of 54 °C, which is attributed to the presence of PEG in the microparticles. This is consistent with a previous report, where a similar transition of T g was observed with a film made by solvent casting of PLG (75:25) and PEG (10 kDa) 27. The lack of PEG melting endotherm for the PLG/PEG microparticles could be explained by the high miscibility and small mass fraction of PEG in microparticles, probably smaller than the initial loading of 10 % w/w, due to partial PEG diffusion out of the particles during the solvent evaporation step of fabrication.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, microparticles composed of a blend of PLG and PEG exhibited a higher T g of 54 °C, which is attributed to the presence of PEG in the microparticles. This is consistent with a previous report, where a similar transition of T g was observed with a film made by solvent casting of PLG (75:25) and PEG (10 kDa) 27. The lack of PEG melting endotherm for the PLG/PEG microparticles could be explained by the high miscibility and small mass fraction of PEG in microparticles, probably smaller than the initial loading of 10 % w/w, due to partial PEG diffusion out of the particles during the solvent evaporation step of fabrication.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), poly(L-lactide) (PLA), and poly(glycolide) (PGA) have received considerable attention for many biomedical applications based on their good thermal stability [13], biocompatibility[4, 5], adequate mechanical properties [4, 6, 7], and cell adhesion [8]. These polyesters are also bioerodible [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the reason that the higher T m of NF was signicantly increased compared to those of 8cPEGa is attributed to the immiscibility of 8cPEGa with PLGA-SH. [28][29][30][31] The crystalline region of PEG is known to be separate from PLGA in the mixture of 8cPEG and PLGA-SH and forms multiple domains in the polymeric chains. Upon increasing the amount of PEG in the blend (10, 30, and 50%), the number of the PEG domains in the mixture is accordingly increased, which consequently increases the crystallinity as well as the T m values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%