The effect of exposure to long working hours on stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury

Descatha, Alexis; Sembajwe, Grace; Pega, Frank; Ujita, Yuka; Baer, Michael D.; Boccuni, Fabio; Tecco, Cristina Di; Duret, Clément; Evanoff, Bradley; Gagliardi, Diana; Godderis, Lode; Kang, Suk Bong; Kim, Beom Joon; Li, Jian; Hanson, Linda L. Magnusson; Marinaccio, Alessandro; Ozguler, Anna; Pachito, Daniela Vianna; Pell, John; Pico, Fernando; Ronchetti, Matteo; Roquelaure, Yves; Rugulies, Reiner; Schouteden, Martijn; Siegrist, Johannes; Tsutsumi, Atsushi; Iavicoli, Sergio

doi:10.1016/j.envint.2020.105746

Cited by 92 publications

(93 citation statements)

References 75 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The estimates were significant for ischemic stroke but not significant for hemorrhagic stroke. There were three significant estimates for the association of long working hours with overall stroke, the two higher quality estimates providing higher values of similar magnitude (RR of around 1.3) (21,44). Three IPD-Work consortium studies without literature review explored other cardiovascular diseases and reported significant associations between job strain and peripheral artery disease (high quality) (30), and long working hours and arterial fibrillation (high quality) (41) and venous thromboembolism (moderate quality) (40).…”

Section: Pooled Estimates For Each Exposure-outcome Associationmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…Figure 3 presents the results for stroke. Five papers (21,26,34,44,75) provided estimates that were based on literature reviews except one IPD-Work consortium study without literature review (26). For all, prospective design was a selection criterion and quality assessment was high, with one exception.…”

Section: Pooled Estimates For Each Exposure-outcome Associationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Psychosocial work exposures and health outcomes: a meta-review of 72 literature reviews with meta-analysis

Niedhammer¹,

Bertrais²,

Witt³

2021

Scand J Work Environ Health

148

106

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Psychosocial work exposures and health outcomes: a meta-review of 72 literature reviews with meta-analysis by Niedhammer I, Bertrais S, Witt K This meta-review aimed to present all available pooled estimates for the associations between psychosocial work exposures and health outcomes. Given its very broad objective, it is probably the most comprehensive meta-review performed so far on this topic. Based on a rigorous methodology, this meta-review underlines convincing associations as targets for prevention, and also knowledge gaps as avenues for future research.

show abstract

Section: Pooled Estimates For Each Exposure-outcome Associationmentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Pooled Estimates For Each Exposure-outcome Associationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychosocial work exposures and health outcomes: a meta-review of 72 literature reviews with meta-analysis

Niedhammer¹,

Bertrais²,

Witt³

2021

Scand J Work Environ Health

148

106

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The potential value of SR methods for similarly advancing toxicology and chemical risk assessment was first mooted in the published literature around the mid-2000s (Guzelian et al 2005;Hoffmann and Hartung 2006). By 2014, the first SR frameworks for chemical risk assessment had been published (European Food Safety Authority 2010; Rooney et al 2014;Woodruff and Sutton 2014), with subsequent rapid uptake from regional (Schaefer and Myers 2017), national (Yost et al 2019), and international agencies (Descatha et al 2020;Orellano et al 2020).…”

Section: Systematic Reviewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge Organization Systems for Systematic Chemical Assessments

Whaley

Edwards

Kraft

et al. 2020

Environ Health Perspect

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Although the implementation of systematic review and evidence mapping methods stands to improve the transparency and accuracy of chemical assessments, they also accentuate the challenges that assessors face in ensuring they have located and included all the evidence that is relevant to evaluating the potential health effects an exposure might be causing. This challenge of information retrieval can be characterized in terms of “semantic” and “conceptual” factors that render chemical assessments vulnerable to the streetlight effect. Objectives: This commentary presents how controlled vocabularies, thesauruses, and ontologies contribute to overcoming the streetlight effect in information retrieval, making up the key components of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOSs) that enable more systematic access to assessment-relevant information than is currently achievable. The concept of Adverse Outcome Pathways is used to illustrate what a general KOS for use in chemical assessment could look like. Discussion: Ontologies are an underexploited element of effective knowledge organization in the environmental health sciences. Agreeing on and implementing ontologies in chemical assessment is a complex but tractable process with four fundamental steps. Successful implementation of ontologies would not only make currently fragmented information about health risks from chemical exposures vastly more accessible, it could ultimately enable computational methods for chemical assessment that can take advantage of the full richness of data described in natural language in primary studies. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6994

show abstract

“…To optimize parameters used in estimation models, WHO and ILO are conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that include estimates of the effect of occupational exposure to welding fumes on trachea, bronchus and lung cancer. In this article, we present the protocol for this systematic review, in parallel to presenting systematic review protocols or completed systematic reviews on other additional risk factor-outcome pairs elsewhere ( Descatha et al, 2018 , Descatha et al, 2020 , Godderis et al, 2018 , Hulshof et al, 2019 , Li et al, 2018 , Li et al, 2020 , Mandrioli et al, 2018 , Paulo et al, 2019 , Rugulies et al, 2019 , Teixeira et al, 2019 , Tenkate et al, 2019 ). The WHO/ILO joint estimation methodology and the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates are separate from these systematic reviews; they will be described and reported elsewhere.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of occupational exposure to welding fumes on trachea, bronchus and lung cancer: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury

Pega

Chartres

Guha

et al. 2020

Environment International

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The effect of exposure to long working hours on stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury

Cited by 92 publications

References 75 publications

Psychosocial work exposures and health outcomes: a meta-review of 72 literature reviews with meta-analysis

Psychosocial work exposures and health outcomes: a meta-review of 72 literature reviews with meta-analysis

Knowledge Organization Systems for Systematic Chemical Assessments

The effect of occupational exposure to welding fumes on trachea, bronchus and lung cancer: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About