2009
DOI: 10.3390/ma2041858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Evolving Damage on the Finite Strain Response of Inelastic and Viscoelastic Composites

Abstract: A finite strain micromechanical model is generalized in order to incorporate the effect of evolving damage in the metallic and polymeric phases of unidirectional composites. As a result, it is possible to predict the response of composites with ductile and brittle phases undergoing large coupled inelastic-damage and viscoelastic-damage deformations, respectively. For inelastic composites, both finite strain elastoplastic (time-independent) and viscoplastic (time-dependent) behaviors are considered. The ductile… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous works have investigated the behavior of composites using rate-independent and ratedependent phenomenological models [23,24,25]. In this study, a viscous damage model is used to describe the evolution of microcrack damage within the fiber and matrix phases of the composite to capture the rate-dependence observed in experiments.…”
Section: Composite Damage Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works have investigated the behavior of composites using rate-independent and ratedependent phenomenological models [23,24,25]. In this study, a viscous damage model is used to describe the evolution of microcrack damage within the fiber and matrix phases of the composite to capture the rate-dependence observed in experiments.…”
Section: Composite Damage Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important mechanical feature exhibited by this type of materials is the damage effect. Two main types of damage theories exist, which are classified in micromechanical and phenomenological damage models, respectively [36]. Although both try to describe the same effect, several differences exist between them: micromechanical models allow micro-mechanisms to be captured explicitly by introducing internal variables such as dislocations, slips, etc., and hence are generally more accurate than phenomenological models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%