The Effect of EVA and TPU Custom Foot Orthoses on Running Economy, Running Mechanics, and Comfort

Abstract

Custom made foot orthoses (CFO) with specific material properties have the potential to alter ground reaction forces but their effect on running mechanics and comfort remains to be investigated. We determined if CFO manufactured from ethyl-vinyl acetate (EVA) and expanded thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) materials, both compared to standardized footwear (CON), improve running economy (RE), running mechanics, and comfort at two running speeds. Eighteen well-trained, male athletes ran on an instrumented treadmill for 6 min at high (HS) and low (LS) speeds corresponding to and 15% lower than their first ventilatory threshold (13.8 ± 1.1 and 11.7 ± 0.9 km.h −1 , respectively) in three footwear conditions (CON, EVA, and TPU). RE, running mechanics and comfort were determined. Albeit not reaching statistical significance (P = 0.11, η 2 = 0.12), RE on average improved in EVA (+2.1 ± 4.8 and +2.9 ± 4.9%) and TPU (+0.9 ± 5.9 and +0.9 ± 5.3%) compared to CON at LS and HS, respectively. Braking force was decreased by 3.4 ± 9.1% at LS and by 2.7 ± 9.8% at HS for EVA compared to CON (P = 0.03, η 2 = 0.20). TPU increased propulsive loading rate by 20.2 ± 24 and 16.4 ± 23.1% for LS and HS, respectively compared to CON (P = 0.01, η 2 = 0.25). Both arch height (P = 0.06, η 2 = 0.19) and medio-lateral control (P = 0.06, η 2 = 0.16) showed a trend toward improved comfort for EVA and TPU vs. CON. Compared to shoes only, mainly EVA tended to improve RE and comfort at submaximal running speeds. Specific CFO-related running mechanical adjustments included a reduced braking impulse occurring in the first 25% of contact time with EVA, whereas wearing TPU increased propulsive loading rate.

Applications of 3D Printed Biomaterials in Reconstructive Surgery of the Anterior SkullB

“…Although TPU is flexible and abrasion-resistant, it cannot withstand high temperatures [32]. Its properties make TPU the ideal option for insoles, foot orthoses or thumb supports [33].…”

Increased footwear comfort is associated with improved running economy – a systematic review and meta‐analysis

“…Four out of six studies used a single item VAS scale to rate a complex construct such as footwear comfort either with or without ranking the footwear conditions from most to least comfortable (Lindorfer et al, 2020;Sinclair, McGrath, et al, 2016;Sinclair, Shore, et al, 2016;Souza et al, 2018). The need to identify and rate individual components of footwear such as the heel, arch and forefoot in different dimensions such as stability or cushioning is essential (Van Alsenoy, Ryu, & Girard, 2019). The nine-item comfort scale developed by Mundermann et al (2002) is the Fourthly, in all studies, recreational runners were asked to choose which footwear condition was more comfortable compared to others.…”

Nanocomposite Foams with Balanced Mechanical Properties and Energy Return from EVA and CNT for the Midsole of Sports Footwear Application

“…This is due to its lightweight, great surface resilience, low energy absorption, and high energy return. Foot orthoses made from EVA show improved running economy and comfort of athletes as compared to other polymer foams [ 1 ]. However, foamed EVA is relatively soft and lacks mechanical properties.…”