1939
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1939.036159950003000c0026x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Erosion on Losses of Soil Organic Matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
7
0

Year Published

1943
1943
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Linear correlation between SOC with 137 Cs and 210 Pb ex was observed in our study, suggesting that SOC in the soil decreased with increased soil erosion, in agreement with previous studies [ Polyakov and Lal , 2004; Li et al , 2006]. Other studies proposed that SOC content and redistribution were directly related to the quantity of soil eroded [ Slater and Carleton , 1938; Kreznor et al , 1992; Bernard and Laverdiere , 2000; Pennock and Frick , 2001], but most of them gave only a qualitative description and few quantifying relationships. The positive relationship was further supported by our previous results [ Li et al , 2006] that showed that SOC redistribution, 137 Cs and 210 Pb ex inventories have the same physical mechanism moving soil and SOC over the cultivated hillslope.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Linear correlation between SOC with 137 Cs and 210 Pb ex was observed in our study, suggesting that SOC in the soil decreased with increased soil erosion, in agreement with previous studies [ Polyakov and Lal , 2004; Li et al , 2006]. Other studies proposed that SOC content and redistribution were directly related to the quantity of soil eroded [ Slater and Carleton , 1938; Kreznor et al , 1992; Bernard and Laverdiere , 2000; Pennock and Frick , 2001], but most of them gave only a qualitative description and few quantifying relationships. The positive relationship was further supported by our previous results [ Li et al , 2006] that showed that SOC redistribution, 137 Cs and 210 Pb ex inventories have the same physical mechanism moving soil and SOC over the cultivated hillslope.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Second, while it is certain that soil respiration has signi®cantly contributed to observed SOC declines in cultivated soils, the contribution of soil erosion is not negligible. Our model output as well as data from others (Slater and Carleton, 1938;Gregorich and Anderson, 1985;De Jong and Kachanoski, 1988;Pennock et al,1995;Gregorich et al,1998) support this view. In an evaluation of SOC evolution in Missouri croplands, Slater and Carleton (1938) stated that SOC loss due to erosion was several times greater than that due to biological oxidation.…”
Section: Model Outputsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Our model output as well as data from others (Slater and Carleton, 1938;Gregorich and Anderson, 1985;De Jong and Kachanoski, 1988;Pennock et al,1995;Gregorich et al,1998) support this view. In an evaluation of SOC evolution in Missouri croplands, Slater and Carleton (1938) stated that SOC loss due to erosion was several times greater than that due to biological oxidation. Gregorich and Anderson (1985) estimated that 20±70 per cent of historic SOC losses in Canada's chernozemic soils is attributable to erosion.…”
Section: Model Outputsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Soil erosion may not explain large losses ofC on a regional scale (Schlesinger 1986), but has a major impact on redistribution of organic C within ecosystems (Slater and Carleton 1938 Newton et al 1945;Davidson et al 1967). Although soil organic matter storage does increase with concentration, estimates in more recent publications account for the simple fact that storage of soil organic matter and nutrients per unit area or volume increase with concentration as well as soil bulk density and thickness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%