2010
DOI: 10.1021/jp101057a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Environment on the Reaction of Water on the Ceria(111) Surface: A DFT+U Study

Abstract: The interaction of a water molecule with the (111) surfaces of stoichiometric and reduced ceria is investigated using first principle density functional theory with the inclusion of the on-site Coulomb interaction (DFT+U). It is found that on the stoichiometric ceria(111) surface, the water molecule is adsorbed spontaneously through single hydrogen bond configuration. In contrast, on the lightly reduced ceria(111), there exist both molecular adsorption (no-H-bond configuration) and dissociative adsorption (sur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

27
122
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
27
122
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, these experiments have shown that water can easily dissociate on either TiO 2-x /Au(111) or CeO 2-x /Au(111) but that no water dissociation is seen when there are no O vacancies in the supported oxide nanoparticles. These findings are in agreement with surface science experiments showing strong adhesion of molecularly adsorbed water to stoichiometric CeO 2 (111) [29] and further surface reduction when reduced CeO 2-x (111) was exposed to water with a concomitant presence of hydroxyl groups [30,31] and are also in agreement with theoretical studies based on density functional calculations for the stoichiometric CeO 2 (111) and reduced CeO 2-x (111) surfaces indicating that water does not dissociate on the clean surface, whereas the process becomes thermodynamically favorable on the oxygen vacancies containing surface [32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, these experiments have shown that water can easily dissociate on either TiO 2-x /Au(111) or CeO 2-x /Au(111) but that no water dissociation is seen when there are no O vacancies in the supported oxide nanoparticles. These findings are in agreement with surface science experiments showing strong adhesion of molecularly adsorbed water to stoichiometric CeO 2 (111) [29] and further surface reduction when reduced CeO 2-x (111) was exposed to water with a concomitant presence of hydroxyl groups [30,31] and are also in agreement with theoretical studies based on density functional calculations for the stoichiometric CeO 2 (111) and reduced CeO 2-x (111) surfaces indicating that water does not dissociate on the clean surface, whereas the process becomes thermodynamically favorable on the oxygen vacancies containing surface [32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Note also that different choices of surface unit cell induce different lateral interactions among the adsorbates and to a strong dependence of the binding energy with respect to the coverage. More recently, Yang et al [37,38] studied the interaction of a water molecule with the (111) surfaces of stoichiometric and reduced ceria using DFT ? U.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This configuration is 0.02 eV more stable than the configuration where the electron in the subsurface is localized on just one of the Ce 3+ ions in the subsurface (not shown). The latter configuration was reported to be the most stable configuration for the surface vacancy by Yang et al 19 It is possible the delocalization is an artifact of the rather low value of U employed in this study. U eff from 3.0 to 5.5 eV was reported to be required to localize electrons on Ce ions near bulk vacancies, 35 but apparently U eff values above 3 eV are required for surfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The adsorption energy of water near a surface vacancy was calculated, using GGA+U (U = 5 eV), by Watkins et al 16 to be −0.79 eV, by Yang et al 19 to be −0.54 eV, and by Molinari et al 18 to be −0.82 eV. Kumar et al found a water adsorption energy of −0.64 eV using PBE with 1/2 monolayer (ML) of water and oxygen vacancies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of all the published papers and increasing attentions focusing on Pu oxides, our theoretical understanding on the basic mechanisms for the hydrogenation of Pu-oxide coated Pu is, to put it mildly, very poor. Especially, little is known regarding the interaction behaviors of H 2 on Pu-oxide surfaces, which is in sharp contrast to the depth and comprehensiveness of researches conducted upon the surface reaction mechanisms of ceria [39][40][41][42][43][44]. As far as we are aware, Wu et al [26,27] were the only ones who have studied the interaction between gaseous molecule (H 2 O) and PuO 2 (100)/PuO 2 (110) surfaces, whereas in their literature both the strong correlation effect of Pu-5f electrons and the van der Waals force between polar H 2 O molecule and PuO 2 surfaces were not taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%