2018
DOI: 10.13106/jafeb.2018.vol5.no4.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Entrepreneurship of SMEs on Corporate Capabilities, Dynamic Capability and Technical Performances in South Korea

Abstract: There has been a recent increase in the interest towards founding companies and in line with the South Korean Government's policy on start-up support, discussions are rife about the effect of entrepreneurship on the management and performances of these companies. To enhance the competitiveness of SMEs, it is expedient to acquire and deploy consistent entrepreneurship, differentiate corporate resources, ensure the appropriate utilization of resources and the integration of such factors in response to the changi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Opinions about innovation are diverse (e.g., Limaj & Bernroider, 2019;Yi, Han, & Cha, 2018), more emphasis is placed on innovation performance based on business capabilities in explorative and exploitative innovation. The indicators used by Limaj & Bernroider, (2019) are the ability of organizations to meet the expectations of consumers and customers, new product innovations and TQM, using products themselves within the company's internal environment as an effort to build advocacy for consumers, and the courage to try to enter more marketing channels as e-commerce, as well as the price-oriented emphasis on quality and quantity.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opinions about innovation are diverse (e.g., Limaj & Bernroider, 2019;Yi, Han, & Cha, 2018), more emphasis is placed on innovation performance based on business capabilities in explorative and exploitative innovation. The indicators used by Limaj & Bernroider, (2019) are the ability of organizations to meet the expectations of consumers and customers, new product innovations and TQM, using products themselves within the company's internal environment as an effort to build advocacy for consumers, and the courage to try to enter more marketing channels as e-commerce, as well as the price-oriented emphasis on quality and quantity.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars opine that dynamic capabilities do not show the attributes of heterogeneity and hence cannot be a source of competitive edge (e.g., Zahra, Sapienza, & Davidsson, 2006;Easterby-Smith & Prieto, 2008;Ogunkoya et al, 2014) and that the impact of dynamic capabilities is limited (Zott, 2003) and indirect (Cepeda & Vera, 2007;Nieves & Haller, 2014). Other researchers argue that dynamic capabilities foster competitive advantage (e.g., Ambrosini & Bowman, 2009;Arndt, 2011;Aramand & Valliere, 2012;Li & Liu, 2014;Wang et al, 2015;Lee, Wu, Kuo, & Li, 2016) and technical performances (Yi, Han & Cha, 2018). The author reason that dynamic capabilities promote competitiveness and enhance firm performance.…”
Section: Dynamic Capabilities and Its Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entrepreneurial capability involves judgments and actions of an entrepreneur that contributes to reshaping and leveraging a firm's capability portfolio (Adner & Helfat, 2003;Augier & Teece, 2009), firm competitiveness and performance (Lestari, Leon, Widyastuti, Brabo, & Putra, 2020). Entrepreneurship plays an important role in creating corporate capabilities as (e.g., marketing, R&D, operations capability), has a positive effect on dynamic capability (Yi, Han, & Cha, 2018). Empirical studies on entrepreneurial capability are scanty.…”
Section: Entrepreneurial Capabilities and Its Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Ref. [18] used it in explaining how SME entrepreneurship leads to dynamic capabilities and technical performance. Similarly, Ref.…”
Section: Theoretical Background 21 the Resource-based Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%