1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-2999(98)00330-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of eliprodil on the evolution of a focal cerebral ischaemia in vivo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In preclinical studies, eliprodil had neuroprotective effects at 1 mg/kg (4,40,41). This corresponds to full ($99.5%) receptor occupancy in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In preclinical studies, eliprodil had neuroprotective effects at 1 mg/kg (4,40,41). This corresponds to full ($99.5%) receptor occupancy in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…A hyperacute lesion seen with DWI does not necessarily indicate infarction, because early cellular changes of ischemia (eg, cytotoxic edema) may potentially be reversed and lesion growth may be attenuated by reperfusion or neuroprotective drugs. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] Human studies of stroke with DWI and perfusion MRI have confirmed the ability of these methodologies to detect early ischemic lesions. 40 -47 Correlations of initial lesion volume by DWI to final infarct size on T2-weighted MRI have been observed, as have correlations of acute lesion volumes by DWI and chronic lesion volumes by T2-weighted imaging to scores of stroke clinical severity scales.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that animal studies have identified several strategies for stroke improvement, there is a lack of translation from preclinical to clinical trials. Although several attempts have been made to investigate the efficacy of behavior testing in animal models of white matter injury [ 73 ] and rodent models of stroke [ 74 ], some even measuring the validity and reliability of neurological scores in mice [ 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 ], all have generated conflicting results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%